Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023221›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

Severe radiation-induced lymphopenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer: external validation of two prediction models.

Peter S N van Rossum, Celia Juan-Cruz, Barbara Stam, Maddalena M G Rossi, Steven H Lin, Azadeh Abravan, José S A Belderbos, Jan-Jakob Sonke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Peter S N van RossumDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Celia Juan-CruzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Barbara StamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maddalena M G RossiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Steven H LinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Azadeh AbravanDivision of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
José S A BelderbosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jan-Jakob SonkeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe radiation-induced lymphopenia (RIL) in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is associated with decreased immunotherapy efficacy and survival. At The Christie and MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), prediction models for lymphopenia were developed in lung and esophageal cancer patients, respectively. The aim of this study was to externally validate both models in patients with stage III NSCLC. Methods: Patients who underwent concurrent CRT for stage III NSCLC in 2019-2021 were studied. Outcomes were grade ≥3 and grade 4 lymphopenia during CRT. The Christie model predictors for grade ≥3 lymphopenia included age, baseline lymphocyte count, radiotherapy duration, chemotherapy, mean heart and lung doses, and thoracic vertebrae V20Gy. MDACC predictors for grade 4 lymphopenia were age, baseline lymphocyte count, planning target volume (PTV), and BMI. The external performance of both models was assessed. Results: Among 100 patients, 78 patients (78%) developed grade ≥3 lymphopenia, with grade 4 lymphopenia in 17 (17%). For predicting grade ≥3 lymphopenia, the Christie and MDACC models yielded Conclusion: The PTV-based MDACC prediction model for severe RIL demonstrated superior external performance in NSCLC patients compared to the dosimetry-based Christie model. As such, the MDACC model can aid in identifying patients at high risk for severe lymphopenia. However, to optimize radiotherapy planning, further improvement and external validation of dosimetry-based models is desired.

Indexed as

chemoradiotherapyhematologic toxicitylung cancerlymphopeniaradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38023221
PMCPMC10665840
OpenAlexW4388615952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.