ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023
Retrospective analysis of outcomes for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia in South American centers.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biological and pathogenic roles of major genes harbored in intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Childhood cancer survival in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean, during 2008-2017 (SURVCAN-3): a population-based benchmarking study of 16 821 children.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Pediatric Precursor B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Tertiary Care Cancer Center Experience from a Lower-Middle-Income Country.Journal of cancer & allied specialties · 2026Article
- Hospitalization in the Intensive Care Unit of Children with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2026Article
- Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: an update on treatment and Brazilian perspective.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Discrepancy between central nervous system involvement at diagnosis and relapse burden in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a five-year cohort study in a middle-income setting.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenomic impact and genetic architecture of toxicity in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia induction therapy: an exploratory modeling approach.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Global Challenges in Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia.Acta haematologica · 2026Review
- Childhood cancer survival in low- and middle-income countries and the Global South: emerging evidence and critical gaps from a scoping review of observational studies.EJC paediatric oncology · 2025Review
- Changes in the Outcome of Pediatric Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Single Center, Real-Life Experience.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in the Bajio Region of Mexico: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2025Article
- Enhancing outcomes of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia in workplace diversity in Thailand: multicenter study on behalf of the Thai Pediatric Oncology Group.Annals of hematology · 2024Article
- Prevalence and Treatment Outcomes of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Kosovo.Cancers · 2024Article
- NGAL Superiority to Creatinine in the Diagnosis of Renal Injury in a Pediatric Tertiary Hospital Setting.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Acute lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) is the most common pediatric malignancy. While the survival rate for childhood ALL exceeds 90% in high-income countries, the estimated survival in low-and middle-income countries ranges from 22-79%, depending on the region and local resources. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed demographic, biological, and clinical parameters of children under 18 years of age with newly diagnosed ALL presenting between 2013-2017 across five pediatric centers in 4 countries in South America. Survival analyses were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Across the five centers, 752 patients were analyzed (Bolivia [N=9], Ecuador [N=221], Paraguay [N=197], Peru [N=325]) and 92.1% (n=690) patients were diagnosed with B-cell and 7.5% (n= 56) with T-cell ALL. The median age was 5.5 years old (IQR 7.29). At diagnosis, 47.8% of patients were categorized as standard and 51.9% as high risk per their institutional regimen. Advanced diagnostics availability varied between modalities. MRD was evaluated in 69.1% of patients; molecular testing was available for ETV6-RUNX, BCR-ABL1, TCF3-PBX1, and KMT2A-rearranged ALL in 75-81% of patients; however, karyotyping and evaluation for iAMP21 were only performed in 42-61% of patients. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement was evaluated at diagnosis in 57.3% (n=429) patients; of these, 93.7% (n=402) were CNS 1, 1.6% (n=7) were CNS 2, 0.7% (n=11) were CNS3, 1.9% (n=8) had cranial nerve palsy, and 2.1% (n=9) results unavailable. Chemotherapy delays >2 weeks were reported in 56.0% (n=421) patients during treatment. Delays were attributed to infection in 63.2% (n=265), drug-related toxicities in 47.3% (n=198), and resource constraints, including lack of bed availability in 23.2% (n=97) of patients. The 3-year Abandonment-sensitive EFS and OS were 61.0±1.9% and 67.2±1.8%, respectively. The 3-year EFS and OS were 71.0±1.8% and 79.6±1.7%, respectively. Discussion: This work reveals opportunities to improve survival, including addressing severe infections, treatment interruptions, and modifications due to drug shortages. In 2018, healthcare professionals across South America established the Pediatric Oncology Latin America (POLA) group in collaboration with St. Jude Children's Research Hospital. POLA collaborators developed an evidence-based, consensus-derived, adapted treatment guideline, informed by preliminary results of this evaluation, to serve as the new standard of care for pediatric ALL in participating institutions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.