Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38023149›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2023

A classifier model for prostate cancer diagnosis using CNNs and transfer learning with multi-parametric MRI.

Mubashar Mehmood, Sadam Hussain Abbasi, Khursheed Aurangzeb, Muhammad Faran Majeed, Muhammad Shahid Anwar, Musaed Alhussein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mubashar MehmoodDepartment of Computer Science, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sadam Hussain AbbasiDepartment of Computer Science, Kohsar University Murree, Punjab, Pakistan.
Khursheed AurangzebDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muhammad Faran MajeedDepartment of Computer Science, Kohsar University Murree, Punjab, Pakistan.
Muhammad Shahid AnwarDepartment of AI and Software, Gachon University, Seongnam, Republic of Korea.
Musaed AlhusseinDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Computer and Information Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a major global concern, particularly for men, emphasizing the urgency of early detection to reduce mortality. As the second leading cause of cancer-related male deaths worldwide, precise and efficient diagnostic methods are crucial. Due to high and multiresolution MRI in PCa, computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) methods have emerged to assist radiologists in identifying anomalies. However, the rapid advancement of medical technology has led to the adoption of deep learning methods. These techniques enhance diagnostic efficiency, reduce observer variability, and consistently outperform traditional approaches. Resource constraints that can distinguish whether a cancer is aggressive or not is a significant problem in PCa treatment. This study aims to identify PCa using MRI images by combining deep learning and transfer learning (TL). Researchers have explored numerous CNN-based Deep Learning methods for classifying MRI images related to PCa. In this study, we have developed an approach for the classification of PCa using transfer learning on a limited number of images to achieve high performance and help radiologists instantly identify PCa. The proposed methodology adopts the EfficientNet architecture, pre-trained on the ImageNet dataset, and incorporates three branches for feature extraction from different MRI sequences. The extracted features are then combined, significantly enhancing the model's ability to distinguish MRI images accurately. Our model demonstrated remarkable results in classifying prostate cancer, achieving an accuracy rate of 88.89%. Furthermore, comparative results indicate that our approach achieve higher accuracy than both traditional hand-crafted feature techniques and existing deep learning techniques in PCa classification. The proposed methodology can learn more distinctive features in prostate images and correctly identify cancer.

Indexed as

convolutional neural networkdeep learningMRI imagesPCAtransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID38023149
PMCPMC10666634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.