Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022968›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2023

Integrated laboratory classes to learn physiology in a psychology degree: impact on student learning and experience.

Judit Sánchez, Beatriz Navarro-Galve, Marta Lesmes, Margarita Rubio, Beatriz Gal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Judit SánchezDepartamento de Educación y de la Comunicación, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz Navarro-GalveFacultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta LesmesDepartamento de Educación y de la Comunicación, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Margarita RubioDepartamento de Medicina, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas y de la Salud, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz GalFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Camilo José Cela University, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Europea de Madrid · ESCamilo José Cela University · ESDepartamento de Educación · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physiology is a fundamental discipline to be studied in most Health Science studies including Psychology. Physiology content is perceived by students as rather difficult, who may lack vision on how to relate it with their professional training. Therefore, identifying novel active and more engaging pedagogical strategies for teaching physiology to psychology students may help to fill this gap. In this pilot study, we used the PBL methodology developed around a clinical case to evaluate psychology students' experience and learning in two laboratory classes modalities. The aim of this study was to compare the undergraduates' preference for laboratory classes taught either independently (cohort 1,

Indexed as

academic performanceclinical casesintegrated laboratory classeslaboratory classesPBL methodologyphysiology teaching

Identifiers

PMID38022968
PMCPMC10681090
OpenAlexW4388670352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.