ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2023
RETRO-POPE: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Real-World Study of All-Cause Mortality in COPD.
Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The Phenotypes of COPD in Central and Eastern Europe (POPE) study assessed the prevalence and clinical characteristics of four clinical COPD phenotypes, but not mortality. This retrospective analysis of the POPE study (RETRO-POPE) investigated the relationship between all-cause mortality and patient characteristics using two grouping methods: clinical phenotyping (as in POPE) and Burgel clustering, to better identify high-risk patients. Patients and Methods: The two largest POPE study patient cohorts (Czech Republic and Serbia) were categorized into one of four clinical phenotypes (acute exacerbators [with/without chronic bronchitis], non-exacerbators, asthma-COPD overlap), and one of five Burgel clusters based on comorbidities, lung function, age, body mass index (BMI) and dyspnea (very severe comorbid, very severe respiratory, moderate-to-severe respiratory, moderate-to-severe comorbid/obese, and mild respiratory). Patients were followed-up for approximately 7 years for survival status. Results: Overall, 801 of 1,003 screened patients had sufficient data for analysis. Of these, 440 patients (54.9%) were alive and 361 (45.1%) had died at the end of follow-up. Analysis of survival by clinical phenotype showed no significant differences between the phenotypes (P=0.211). However, Burgel clustering demonstrated significant differences in survival between clusters (P<0.001), with patients in the "very severe comorbid" and "very severe respiratory" clusters most likely to die. Overall survival was not significantly different between Serbia and the Czech Republic after adjustment for age, BMI, comorbidities and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65-0.99; P=0.036 [unadjusted]; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.7-1.1; P=0.257 [adjusted]). The most common causes of death were respiratory-related (36.8%), followed by cardiovascular (25.2%) then neoplasm (15.2%). Conclusion: Patient clusters based on comorbidities, lung function, age, BMI and dyspnea were more likely to show differences in COPD mortality risk than phenotypes defined by exacerbation history and presence/absence of chronic bronchitis and/or asthmatic features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.