ArticleOpen respiratory archives
Is Lung Function Measured by Oscillometry Useful in Interstitial Lung Diseases?
Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory oscillometry identifies disease progression in interstitial lung disease.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Observational
- The intra-breath changes of reactance at low frequency in impulse oscillometry: differentiating obstructive airway disease and Interstitial Lung Disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Applications of Forced Oscillatory Technique in Obstructive and Restrictive Pulmonary Diseases: A Concise State of the Art.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Forced oscillation technique in progressive pulmonary fibrosis in a single-center retrospective study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparison of IOS and Body Plethysmography Findings in Patients with Interstitial Lung Disease.Tanaffos · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The role of oscillometry in interstitial lung disease (ILD) is still unclear. The main objective of our study was to describe the parameters determined by oscillometry in these patients and compare them with those obtained in conventional respiratory function tests. Methods: This was a cross-sectional observational study. Patients with no respiratory disease and patients being followed up for ILD in the specialist unit of Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid were included. Results: A total of 45 individuals were analyzed. Fifteen had no respiratory disease, 15 were ILD patients with mild functional impairment, and another 15 were ILD patients with severe impairment. None of the participants had an obstructive pattern on spirometry.Comparison between the three groups showed statistically significant differences in the values of R5-19, reactance at 5 Hz and reactance at 11 Hz. No differences were observed between the three groups in Delta Xrs. The study showed a strong correlation between total and inspiratory reactance at 5 Hz and forced vital capacity and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide. Conclusions: Our results suggest that the findings in ILD are characteristic of this disease and that they differ from those found in other diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. It also seems that there are differences according to the degree of functional impairment of the patients. The results show a strong correlation with standard pulmonary function tests, so oscillometry could be a useful tool in patients with ILD who are unable to perform it, and could provide additional information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.