Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022753›Full record

ArticleJournal of asthma and allergy2023

Errors in Metered Dose Inhaler Use Amongst Pediatric Asthma Patients.

Eeshta Bhatt, Robert A Malkin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of asthma and allergy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eeshta BhattPratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-5397-7324
Robert A MalkinPratt School of Engineering, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5542-209X
Duke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to use easily accessible smartphones as a straightforward means for physicians to objectively check Medical Device Inhaler (MDI) technique, without the need for additional devices. Additionally, we seek to assess the frequency of inhaler technique errors and their impact on asthma control. Patients and Methods: Thirty-two children between the ages of 5 and 18 receiving asthma therapy through MDIs were included. Three surveys were administered to all participants to gauge device history, asthma control, and patient characteristics. Patient technique was scored using inhaler audio signals recorded with a smartphone. For subjects that were able, forced oscillation technique (FOT) was performed during tidal breathing conditions before and after corticosteroid administration. Results: 81% (25/31) of participants used their MDIs incorrectly with the most common errors being rapid shallow breathing, inadequate breath-holding, and excessive actuations. Poor inhaler technique correlated with poorly controlled asthma symptoms. Conclusion: The use of smartphone recordings can a convenient way to evaluate technique errors and could allow patients to demonstrate and refine their technique and usage without a doctor's visit, ensuring proper technique and enhancing treatment effectiveness.

Indexed as

asthma controlasthma managementchildreninhaler techniquenon-compliance

Identifiers

PMID38022753
PMCPMC10674557
OpenAlexW4388813840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.