Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022711›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2024

Women on the frontline: exploring the gendered experience for Pacific healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Georgina Phillips, Mangu Kendino, Claire E Brolan, Lisa-Maree Herron, Sarah Kὃrver, Silina Motofaga, Megan Cox

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Georgina PhillipsSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Mangu KendinoPort Moresby General Hospital, Papua New Guinea.
Claire E BrolanSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Lisa-Maree HerronSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Sarah KὃrverTB Elimination, and Implementation Science, Burnet Institute, Papua New Guinea and Australia.
Silina MotofagaClinical Services Program, Public Health Division, Pacific Community, Suva, Fiji.
Megan CoxFaculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUBurnet Institute · AUPacific Community · NCPort Moresby General Hospital · PGSt Vincent's Hospital Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Women comprise 90% of patient-facing global healthcare workers (HCWs), yet remain underpaid, undervalued, and under-represented in leadership and decision-making positions, particularly across the Pacific region. The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated these health workplace inequalities. We sought to understand Pacific women HCWs experience from the COVID-19 frontline to contribute to policies aimed at addressing gendered gaps in regional health systems. Methods: Our interpretative phenomenological study used critical feminist and social theory, and a gendered health systems analytical framework. Data were collected using online focus groups and in-depth interviews with 36 Pacific regional participants between March 2020 and July 2021. Gender-specific content and women's voices were privileged for inductive analysis by Pacific and Australian women researchers with COVID-19 frontline lived experience. Findings: Pacific women HCWs have authority and responsibility resulting from their familial, biological, and cultural status, but are often subordinate to men. They were emancipatory leaders during COVID-19, and as HCWs demonstrated compassion, situational awareness, and concern for staff welfare. Pacific women HCWs also faced ethical challenges to prioritise family or work responsibilities, safely negotiate childbearing, and maintain economic security. Interpretation: Despite enhanced gendered power differentials during COVID-19, Pacific women HCWs used their symbolic capital to positively influence health system performance. Gender-transformative policies are urgently required to address disproportionate clinical and community care burdens and to protect and support the Pacific female health workforce. Funding: Epidemic Ethics/World Health Organization (WHO), Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office/Wellcome Grant 214711/Z/18/Z. Co-funding: Australasian College for Emergency Medicine Foundation, International Development Fund Grant.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical feminist methodologyEmergency careEmergency medicineGenderGender analysisHealth systemsPacific IslandsPacific RegionSocial theoryWomenWomen healthcare workers

Identifiers

PMID38022711
PMCPMC10658397
OpenAlexW4388509533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.