Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022626›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Effectiveness and waning of protection with the BNT162b2 vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in immunocompromised individuals.

Zoltán Szekanecz, Zoltán Vokó, Orsolya Surján, Éva Rákóczi, Szilvia Szamosi, Gabriella Szűcs, Éva Szekanecz, Cecília Müller, Zoltán Kiss

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Zoltán Szekanecz *Department of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Zoltán Vokó *Center for Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Orsolya SurjánDepartment of Deputy Chief Medical Officer II., National Public Health Center Management, Budapest, Hungary.
Éva RákócziDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Szilvia SzamosiDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gabriella SzűcsDepartment of Rheumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Éva SzekaneczDepartment of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.
Cecília MüllerDepartment of Chief Medical Officer, National Public Health Center Management, Budapest, Hungary.
Zoltán Kiss *Second Department of Medicine and Nephrology-Diabetes Center, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary.
University of Debrecen · HUNational Public Health and Medical Officer Service · HUSemmelweis University · HUUniversity of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In Hungary, the HUN-VE 3 study determined the comparative effectiveness of various primary and booster vaccination strategies during the Delta COVID-19 wave. That study included more than 8 million 18-100-year-old individuals from the beginning of the pandemic. Immunocompromised (IC) individuals have increased risk for COVID-19 and disease course might be more severe in them. In this study, we wished to estimate the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 related death in IC individuals compared to healthy ones and the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine by reassessing HUN-VE 3 data. Patients and methods: Among the 8,087,988 individuals undergoing follow-up from the onset of the pandemic in the HUN-VE 3 cohort, we selected all the 263,116 patients with a diagnosis corresponding with IC and 6,128,518 controls from the second wave, before vaccinations started. The IC state was defined as two occurrences of corresponding ICD-10 codes in outpatient or inpatient claims data since 1 January, 2013. The control group included patients without chronic diseases. The data about vaccination, SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 related death were obtained from the National Public Health Center (NPHC) during the Delta wave. Cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported on a daily basis using a centralized system via the National Public Health Center (NPHC). Results: Out of the 263,116 IC patients 12,055 patients (4.58%) and out of the 6,128,518 healthy controls 202,163 (3.30%) acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. Altogether 436 IC patients and 2141 healthy controls died in relation to COVID-19. The crude incidence rate ratio (IRR) of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 1.40 (95%CI: 1.37-1.42) comparing IC patients to healthy controls. The crude mortality rate ratio was 4.75 (95%CI: 4.28-5.27). With respect to SARS-CoV-2 infection, interestingly, the BNT162b2 vaccine was more effective in IC patients compared to controls. Primary vaccine effectiveness (VE) was higher in IC patients compared to controls and the booster restored VE after waning. VE regarding COVID-19 related death was less in IC patients compared to healthy individuals. Booster vaccination increased VE against COVID-19-related death in both IC patients and healthy controls. Conclusion: There is increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 related mortality in IC patient. Moreover, booster vaccination using BNT162b2 might restore impaired VE in these individuals.

Indexed as

COVID-19VaccinesAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBNT162 VaccineHumansMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Young AdultBNT162 VaccineVaccinesBNT162b2 vaccineboosterCOVID-19immunocompromised patientsSARS-CoV-2vaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID38022626
PMCPMC10652789
OpenAlexW4388217376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.