Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022542›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2023

Heterologous booster with a novel formulation containing glycosylated trimeric S protein is effective against Omicron.

Daniela Bottero, Erika Rudi, Pablo Martin Aispuro, Eugenia Zurita, Emilia Gaillard, Maria M Gonzalez Lopez Ledesma, Juan Malito, Matthew Stuible, Nicolas Ambrosis, Yves Durocher and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 79% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniela Bottero *Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina.
Erika Rudi *Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina.
Pablo Martin Aispuro *Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina.
Eugenia Zurita *Laboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina.
Emilia GaillardLaboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina.
Maria M Gonzalez Lopez LedesmaFundación Instituto Leloir-Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBBA) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Juan MalitoINCUINTA Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), HURLINGHAM, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Matthew StuibleHuman Health Therapeutics Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Nicolas AmbrosisLaboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina.
Yves DurocherHuman Health Therapeutics Research Center, National Research Council Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Andrea V GamarnikFundación Instituto Leloir-Instituto de Investigaciones Bioquímicas de Buenos Aires (IIBBA) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Andrés WigdorovitzINCUINTA Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), HURLINGHAM, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA) Castelar, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniela HozborLaboratorio VacSal, Instituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular (IBBM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Centro Científico Tecnológico - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CCT-CONICET), La Plata, Argentina.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARUniversidad Nacional de La Plata · ARNational Research Council Canada · CAFundación Instituto Leloir · ARInstituto de Biotecnología y Biología Molecular · ARNational Agricultural Technology Institute · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a heterologous three-dose vaccination schedule against the Omicron BA.1 SARS-CoV-2 variant infection using a mouse intranasal challenge model. The vaccination schedules tested in this study consisted of a primary series of 2 doses covered by two commercial vaccines: an mRNA-based vaccine (mRNA1273) or a non-replicative vector-based vaccine (AZD1222/ChAdOx1, hereafter referred to as AZD1222). These were followed by a heterologous booster dose using one of the two vaccine candidates previously designed by us: one containing the glycosylated and trimeric spike protein (S) from the ancestral virus (SW-Vac 2µg), and the other from the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2 (SD-Vac 2µg), both formulated with Alhydrogel as an adjuvant. For comparison purposes, homologous three-dose schedules of the commercial vaccines were used. The mRNA-based vaccine, whether used in heterologous or homologous schedules, demonstrated the best performance, significantly increasing both humoral and cellular immune responses. In contrast, for the schedules that included the AZD1222 vaccine as the primary series, the heterologous schemes showed superior immunological outcomes compared to the homologous 3-dose AZD1222 regimen. For these schemes no differences were observed in the immune response obtained when SW-Vac 2µg or SD-Vac 2µg were used as a booster dose. Neutralizing antibody levels against Omicron BA.1 were low, especially for the schedules using AZD1222. However, a robust Th1 profile, known to be crucial for protection, was observed, particularly for the heterologous schemes that included AZD1222. All the tested schedules were capable of inducing populations of CD4 T effector, memory, and follicular helper T lymphocytes. It is important to highlight that all the evaluated schedules demonstrated a satisfactory safety profile and induced multiple immunological markers of protection. Although the levels of these markers were different among the tested schedules, they appear to complement each other in conferring protection against intranasal challenge with Omicron BA.1 in K18-hACE2 mice. In summary, the results highlight the potential of using the S protein (either ancestral Wuhan or Delta variant)-based vaccine formulation as heterologous boosters in the management of COVID-19, particularly for certain commercial vaccines currently in use.

Indexed as

2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273ChAdOx1 nCoV-19Adjuvants, ImmunologicAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansRNA, MessengerSARS-CoV-22019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273Adjuvants, ImmunologicChAdOx1 nCoV-19RNA, MessengerCOVID-19heterologous boosterOmicronSARS- CoV-2spike-based vaccine

Identifiers

PMID38022542
PMCPMC10667599
OpenAlexW4388632779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.