Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022382›Full record

ReviewBioImpacts : BI2023

The application, safety, and future of

Katelyn R Einloth, Scott Gayfield, Thomas McMaster, Alexander Didier, Lance Dworkin, Justin Fortune Creeden

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioImpacts : BI, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katelyn R EinlothDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5328-9352
Scott GayfieldDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Thomas McMasterDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Alexander DidierDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Lance DworkinDepartment of Medicine, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH 43614, USA.
Justin Fortune CreedenDepartment of Cancer Biology, University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Toledo, OH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3123-8401
University of Toledo · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Immunotherapy has revolutionized how cancer is treated. Many of these immunotherapies rely on Methods: To review the existing literature on cellular immunotherapy, the PubMed database was searched for publications using variations of the phrases "cancer immunotherapy", " Results: To circumvent the challenges of traditional T cell-based immunotherapies, researchers have developed newer therapies including tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), T cell receptor (TCR) modified T cell, and antibody-armed T cell therapies. Additionally, newer immunotherapeutic strategies have used other immune cells, including natural killer (NK) and dendritic cells (DC), to modulate the T cell immune response to cancers. From a prognostic perspective, circulating tumor cells (CTC) have been used to predict cancer morbidity and mortality. Conclusion: This review highlights the mechanism and clinical utility of various types of

Indexed as

Adoptive cell therapyCancer immunotherapyCirculating tumor cellsDC vaccinationEx vivo expansionT cell immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID38022382
PMCPMC10676524
OpenAlexW4385852104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.