Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022341›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

One Size Does Not Fit All: Medication Reconciliation and Review at the Hospital at Home.

Daniela Madeira, Flávia Baduy, Ana Orfão, Clara Matos, Rui Osório, Ana C Brito

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Daniela MadeiraInternal Medicine, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, PRT.
Flávia BaduyFamily Medicine, Unidade de Saúde Familiar Tejo, Agrupamento de Centros de Saúde (ACES) Loures/Odivelas, Loures, PRT.
Ana OrfãoInternal Medicine, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, PRT.
Clara MatosInternal Medicine, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, PRT.
Rui OsórioHospital at Home, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, PRT.
Ana C BritoHospital at Home, Hospital Professor Doutor Fernando Fonseca, Amadora, PRT.
San Antonio College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mistakes in the medication process are frequent and a common cause of morbidity and mortality. Medication reconciliation (MRec) and medication review (MRev) are the processes of creating the most accurate medication list and adapting it to optimize the effectiveness of medicines and minimize adverse effects. This is crucial in all stages of medical care, especially at discharge. The present study aims to evaluate and describe the process of MRec and MRev, with a focus on deprescribing, that we conduct at the Hospital at Home. We performed a retrospective cohort study including adult patients admitted at our Hospital at Home from 1 November 2022 to 30 April 2023. MRec and MRev were applied during hospitalization, according to patients' characteristics and clinical evolution, and then communicated to patients upon discharge. Our study involved 125 patients, with an average age of 67.6±18.0 years, and half of them had polypharmacy. We discovered discrepancies in 43.2% of patient's medication and did deprescribing in one-third of them. In the deprescribing group, patients were significantly older (mean age, 76.1 versus 66.4 years; p=0.044). It is imperative to create mechanisms to identify patients at a greater risk of adverse drug events and to minimize the burden of care and harms associated with treatments. The Hospital at Home could be an opportunity, although further research is essential.

Indexed as

deprescriptionhospital at homemedication reconciliationmedication revisionpolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID38022341
PMCPMC10658747
OpenAlexW4387845152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.