Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022323›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

The Impact of Social Media Applications on Donor Engagement and Retention in the Saudi Arabian Blood Donation System.

Turki Alanzi, Nouf Alanzi, Nwrah Alsleman, Danah Bu-Sarair, Abdulrahman Abdulaziz A Almaqabel, Reyam Alharbi, Khuzama Alarfaj, Basil Alahmadi, Nawal Alamri, Malath Alshahrani and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Social Media as a Tool for Health Promotion and Disease Management in Saudi Arabia: A Systematic Review.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 11 institutions in 2 countries.

Turki AlanziHealth Information Management and Technology Department, College of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Nouf AlanziDepartment of Clinical Laboratories Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, SAU.
Nwrah AlslemanDepartment of Central Blood Bank, Qurayat Regional Laboratory and Blood Bank, Qurayat, SAU.
Danah Bu-SarairCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, SAU.
Abdulrahman Abdulaziz A AlmaqabelDepartment of Medical Laboratories, ‏College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Reyam AlharbiCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Hafr Al Batin, Hafr Al Batin, SAU.
Khuzama AlarfajDepartment of Medical Laboratories, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Buraydah, SAU.
Basil AlahmadiCollege of Pharmacy, University of Hail, Hail, SAU.
Nawal AlamriDepartment Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, SAU.
Malath AlshahraniFaculty of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, SAU.
Reaam AlharbiCollege of Nursing, ‏Jazan University, Jazan, SAU.
Saud AlenaziTransfusion Medicine Services Department, King Abdulaziz Medical City-Riyadh, Riyadh, SAU.
Hoda AlghamdiCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, SAU.
Sadeem AlmufarrijCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, SAU.
Al Jouf University · SAImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAJazan University · SAAmerican Association of Blood Banks · USBuraydah Colleges · SAKing Abdulaziz Medical City · SAKing Khalid University · SAKing Saud University · SAQassim University · SASecurity Forces Hospital · SAUniversity of Ha'il · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study purposeThe objective of this study is to evaluate the influence of social media applications on donor engagement and retention within the blood donation system in Saudi Arabia.

methodsA cross-sectional survey design was adopted in this study. The population aged above 18 years and living in Saudi Arabia was included in the study. Using convenience and snowball sampling techniques, an online questionnaire was distributed using social media channels such as WhatsApp, Facebook, and Instagram. A total of 463 participants were included in the study.

resultsThe majority of the study participants (78.1%) engage on social media applications multiple times a day for charity causes such as blood donation by responding to requests, while 51.8% of them engage on social media applications for the same reason a few times a month. Focusing on donor engagement, 46.8% and 27.3% of the total participants were likely to engage in the blood donation process; 60% were likely to continue to use social media applications for blood donation. The ANOVA findings showed a significant difference (p<0.05) between participant groups characterized by age and educational level on their engagement on social media applications for the blood donation process. Younger participants and participants with bachelor's degrees and above were more likely to engage in social media applications for the blood donation process compared to minimum educated and older participants (p<0.05).

conclusionCharity or blood donation organizations must adopt strategies to actively engage the donors on the platforms, as social media can effectively contribute to donor engagement and retention.

Indexed as

donorinvestigatingsaudi arabiansocial mediasystem

Identifiers

PMID38022323
PMCPMC10657647
OpenAlexW4387805315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.