ArticleCureus2023
Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Challenging Diagnosis.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a relatively uncommon cause of acute coronary syndrome, which is mainly reported in postpartum patients and patients without typical cardiac risk factors. Our case was a 58-year-old female with a history of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia who presented with non-exertional crushing retrosternal chest pain and was found to have ST elevation in inferior leads. Immediate cardiac catheterization was suggestive of spontaneous dissection of the third obtuse marginal artery, which was managed conservatively. Clinical suspicion is crucial for SCAD diagnosis, as it might be difficult to distinguish between coronary artery occlusion and SCAD. Moreover, revascularization in SCAD can be associated with complications. Therefore, SCAD needs to be considered as a differential diagnosis not only in patients without cardiac risk factors but also in patients with known cardiac risk factors like our case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.