Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022294›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Virtual Clinical Simulation for Training Amongst Undergraduate Medical Students: A Pilot Randomised Trial (VIRTUE-Pilot).

Felipe T Martinez, Juan Pablo Soto, Daniela Valenzuela, Nicolás González, Jorge Corsi, Patricio Sepúlveda

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Felipe T MartinezClinical Research, Concentra Educación e Investigación Biomédica, Viña del Mar, CHL.
Juan Pablo SotoClinical Simulation Hospital, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar, CHL.
Daniela ValenzuelaClinical Simulation Hospital, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar, CHL.
Nicolás GonzálezIntensive Care Unit, Clínica Ciudad del Mar, Viña del Mar, CHL.
Jorge CorsiIntensive Care Unit, Clínica Ciudad del Mar, Viña del Mar, CHL.
Patricio SepúlvedaClinical Simulation Hospital, Faculdad de Medicina, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar, CHL.
Viña del Mar University · CLUniversidad del Mar · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical virtual simulators are promising new technologies that might facilitate teaching clinical skills.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether a virtual reality simulator might facilitate learning and improve adherence to current clinical guidelines. METHODOLOGY: A double-masked randomised trial was undertaken among fourth-year medical students at Universidad Andres Bello, Chile. Participants were randomised to a clinical virtual simulator (Body Interact®, Body Interact Inc., Austin, TX) or a small-group discussion session on the management of myocardial infarction. Main outcomes included performance in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) and adherence to clinical recommendations. Analyses were undertaken under the intention to treat principle by an independent statistician.

resultsFifty students volunteered to participate. Most were female (30 students, 58.8%) and had a mean age of 23.0±2.7 years. Thirty-two participants (62.8%) had used virtual reality platforms before. Students allocated to the simulator showed better OSCE scores (mean difference: 2.8 points; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.2 to +8.7 points, p=0.14) and were faster to implement diagnostic and therapeutic interventions, but not in a statistically significant way. DISCUSSION: Academic performance was slightly improved by the use the simulator, although the overall effect was smaller than expected.

conclusionThis study examined the influence of a clinical virtual simulator on the academic performance and guideline adherence of undergraduate medical students, with small group discussions as a point of comparison. The findings revealed that there were no statistically significant distinctions between the two methods, potentially attributed to the selection of the comparator and the relatively brief intervention period.

Indexed as

myocardial infarctionphysician guideline adherenceundergraduate medical studentvirtual educationvirtual reality simulation

Identifiers

PMID38022294
PMCPMC10663973
OpenAlexW4387880374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.