Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022275›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Prevalence and Clinical Significance of Incidental Findings in the Maxillofacial Complex of Adolescent Orthodontic Patients: A Retrospective Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis.

Lily Etemad, Shivam Mehta, Alan G Lurie, Aditya Tadinada

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incidental findings from cone-beam computed tomography in children and adolescents: a systematic review.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lily EtemadOrthodontics, Siddiqui Orthodontics, Ann Arbor, USA.
Shivam MehtaOrthodontics, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, USA.
Alan G LurieOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, USA.
Aditya TadinadaOral and Maxillofacial Radiology, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, USA.
UConn Health · USAmerican Association of Orthodontists · USMarquette University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and severity of incidental findings in the maxillofacial complex of orthodontic patients imaged with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and assign those findings an appropriate clinical significance. METHODOLOGY: Incidental findings (IF) were identified in 250 CBCT scans of adolescent orthodontic patients (aged 13-18 years) with a large field-of-view and categorized based on their anatomic location and placed into one of six subgroups based on anatomic region: i) sino-nasal, ii) dentoalveolar, iii) nasooropharyngeal airway, iv) temporomandibular joint, v) neck, vi) calcifications, and vi) miscellaneous findings. Additionally, findings were assigned a clinical significance score based on severity on a scale of mild, moderate and severe. Mild IF was defined as an IF that does not require any further investigation or referral. Moderate IF was defined as an IF that has the tendency to become clinically significant and should be observed periodically. IFs that warrant further investigation and/or intervention were designated as severe.

resultsThe percentage of IFs in sino-nasal and dento-alveolar regions were 44.7% and 19.1% respectively. The percentage of IFs with mild, moderate, and severe clinical significance were 27%, 72%, and 1%, respectively. Out of the IFs involving calcifications, 80.8% were stylohyoid calcifications and <1% were cranial cavity IFs such as petroclinoid calcifications and falx cerebri calcifications. Among the sino-nasal findings, 1.2% were identified as severe.

conclusionThe sino-nasal region had the highest frequency of IFs. Understanding the prevalence of incidental findings and its clinical relevance is important for clinicians to allow for appropriate monitoring and timely treatment of patients.

Indexed as

3d imagingadolescent orthodonticscone-beam computed tomography (cbct)incidental findingsorthodontics

Identifiers

PMID38022275
PMCPMC10663048
OpenAlexW4387857695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.