Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022156›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Prediction of Antigenic Vaccine Peptide Candidates From BfmRS Associated With Biofilm Formation in Acinetobacter baumannii.

A S Smiline Girija

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

A S Smiline GirijaDepartment of Microbiology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences [SIMATS] Saveetha University, Chennai, IND.
Saveetha University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMATERIALS AND

methods11 different FASTA sequences of bfmR and bfmS from

resultsFour peptide sequences (E1-E4) were predicted for B-cell dominance, with E1, E2, and E4 as probable antigens. All were soluble and non-toxigenic. E1 and E3 were considered non-allergens. GRAVY values were negative for all the peptides, indicating the protein to be hydrophilic in nature. Analysis of the T-cell epitopes was promising, with 100% conservancy for class-I HLA alleles, high interaction scores for similarity with TLR2, and more hydrogen bonds for E2, followed by other epitope peptides.

conclusionThe promising four epitopes, as predicted for bfmR and bfmS in the present study, suggest their potent role as possible candidates for the design of vaccines targeting the TCS of

Indexed as

acinetobacter baumaniibmfrbmfsepitope peptidesin-silico

Identifiers

PMID38022156
PMCPMC10676731
OpenAlexW4388187098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.