Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38022026›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Babies: A 12-Month Observational Study.

Shresth Jain, Putun Patel, Nimisha Pandya, Dhruva Dave, Trupti Deshpande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shresth JainPediatric Medicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, IND.
Putun PatelPediatric Medicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, IND.
Nimisha PandyaPediatric Medicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, IND.
Dhruva DavePediatric Medicine, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, IND.
Trupti DeshpandePediatric Intensive Care Unit, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Preterm births are a significant concern worldwide due to their association with both short- and long-term morbidity. Modern neonatal intensive care techniques have improved the survival of infants born at the brink of viability. However, there remain significant challenges concerning their neurodevelopment. A considerable proportion of very low birth weight infants exhibit significant motor deficits such as cerebral palsy or cognitive, behavioral, or attention disabilities. The consequences of these impairments, particularly given their life-long nature, can be severe for the affected individuals, families, and public health resources. Consequently, timely neurodevelopmental assessment is critical in recognizing delayed development and selecting infants for neurodevelopmental stimulation. This study aimed to estimate the neurodevelopment of preterm infants, identify influencing factors, detect at-risk groups, and refer/recommend early intervention when developmental delays are observed. Methodology This prospective, observational, hospital-based study done in the department of pediatrics, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujrat, India included inborn and outborn preterm neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) or the Sick Newborn Care Unit from their first day of life. The study period was from October 2020 to January 2021, and only neonates with an uncomplicated clinical course were included. Newborns were enrolled in a high-risk clinic, and follow-up appointments were scheduled at three, six, nine, and 12 months of corrected gestational age (CGA). We used the Baroda Developmental Screening Tool (BDST) to calculate the developmental quotient (DQ) at each appointment. This assessment involved parental interviews, observation of developmental milestones, and simple test demonstrations. The gathered DQ data at different ages were analyzed and compared across groups. Results Of 100 preterms enrolled, 62 preterms were followed up until 12 months of CGA. Thirteen patients out of the 62 (approximately one-fifth) preterm neonates exhibited developmental delays at one year of CGA, most of whom were early preterm infants. Twenty-six patients (approximately two-fifths) were delayed at three months of CGA, and thus 13 patients (half) showed catch-up growth and development. There was no statistically significant difference between the neurodevelopment of female and male infants. However, infants born to mothers with better socioeconomic status and higher education showed improved neurodevelopment. Conclusions Our study findings suggest that preterm infants discharged from the NICU exhibit poor neurodevelopmental outcomes, especially those born early preterm. This pattern indicates an inverse relationship between neurodevelopmental delay and the maturity of the neonate. Maternal education and socioeconomic status positively impacted the neurodevelopment of preterm NICU graduates. Thus, regular follow-up (at least once every three months), early detection by a screening scale like the BDST and intervention significantly improved neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Indexed as

extremely low birth weight infantneonatal intensive care unit (nicu)neurodevelopmental outcomeobservational studypreterm babies

Identifiers

PMID38022026
PMCPMC10676465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.