ArticleCureus2023
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Preterm Babies: A 12-Month Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surveillance for neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in high-risk neonates: a cohort study at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Exploring factors influencing mother-infant interaction trajectories post-NICU discharge in low-birth-weight infants during COVID-19 in China: a longitudinal qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Practice-informed barriers and contextual solutions in neonatal habilitation across Indian Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A qualitative exploration of therapists' perspectives.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Nurse-Led Developmental Intervention Package to Improve the Neurodevelopmental Outcomes of Preterm Babies in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.Pediatric discovery · 2025Article
- The Feasibility of the Arabic Version of Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3 to Identify Preterm Infants at Risk of Developmental Delays in Saudi Arabia.Pediatric reports · 2025Article
- Early rehabilitation interventions for global developmental delay in children: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Preterm births are a significant concern worldwide due to their association with both short- and long-term morbidity. Modern neonatal intensive care techniques have improved the survival of infants born at the brink of viability. However, there remain significant challenges concerning their neurodevelopment. A considerable proportion of very low birth weight infants exhibit significant motor deficits such as cerebral palsy or cognitive, behavioral, or attention disabilities. The consequences of these impairments, particularly given their life-long nature, can be severe for the affected individuals, families, and public health resources. Consequently, timely neurodevelopmental assessment is critical in recognizing delayed development and selecting infants for neurodevelopmental stimulation. This study aimed to estimate the neurodevelopment of preterm infants, identify influencing factors, detect at-risk groups, and refer/recommend early intervention when developmental delays are observed. Methodology This prospective, observational, hospital-based study done in the department of pediatrics, Gujarat Medical Education and Research Society (GMERS) Medical College and Hospital, Gotri, Vadodara, Gujrat, India included inborn and outborn preterm neonates admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) or the Sick Newborn Care Unit from their first day of life. The study period was from October 2020 to January 2021, and only neonates with an uncomplicated clinical course were included. Newborns were enrolled in a high-risk clinic, and follow-up appointments were scheduled at three, six, nine, and 12 months of corrected gestational age (CGA). We used the Baroda Developmental Screening Tool (BDST) to calculate the developmental quotient (DQ) at each appointment. This assessment involved parental interviews, observation of developmental milestones, and simple test demonstrations. The gathered DQ data at different ages were analyzed and compared across groups. Results Of 100 preterms enrolled, 62 preterms were followed up until 12 months of CGA. Thirteen patients out of the 62 (approximately one-fifth) preterm neonates exhibited developmental delays at one year of CGA, most of whom were early preterm infants. Twenty-six patients (approximately two-fifths) were delayed at three months of CGA, and thus 13 patients (half) showed catch-up growth and development. There was no statistically significant difference between the neurodevelopment of female and male infants. However, infants born to mothers with better socioeconomic status and higher education showed improved neurodevelopment. Conclusions Our study findings suggest that preterm infants discharged from the NICU exhibit poor neurodevelopmental outcomes, especially those born early preterm. This pattern indicates an inverse relationship between neurodevelopmental delay and the maturity of the neonate. Maternal education and socioeconomic status positively impacted the neurodevelopment of preterm NICU graduates. Thus, regular follow-up (at least once every three months), early detection by a screening scale like the BDST and intervention significantly improved neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.