Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38021953›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Psychological Assessment and Treatment Effectiveness in Mastalgia: Developing a Treatment Algorithm.

Shubhajeet Roy, Gitika N Singh, Nikhil Verma, Gunjan Parasher, Parijat Suryavanshi

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shubhajeet RoyFaculty of Medical Sciences, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Gitika N SinghGeneral Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Nikhil VermaFaculty of Medical Sciences, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Gunjan ParasherFaculty of Medical Sciences, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Parijat SuryavanshiGeneral Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
King George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Mastalgia often impairs the physical, social, and sexual lives of women. It may manifest in both cyclical or acyclical patterns. The psychoneurotic association of mastalgia has been claimed for a long time in various available literature. Several treatment options have been used and are available in the market for mastalgia, but no specific guidelines are currently in place at the global or local levels. This study aims to evaluate the psychological status and effectiveness of various treatment options in women presenting with mastalgia. Methods This study was conducted in the General Surgery outpatient department from February 1 to November 30, 2021, at King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India. Females of all age groups presenting to the General Surgery outpatient department with unilateral/bilateral breast pain and/or chest wall pain were considered for this study. Pregnant patients, those with a history of allergy to drugs, or those who were lost to follow-up were excluded from the study. The psychological status of patients was assessed using the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-42) scale. Pain assessment was performed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were divided into five categories: (i) isolated chest wall pain, (ii) isolated breast pain, (iii) both chest wall and breast pain, (iv) pain with an associated lump(s), and (v) pain and tenderness isolated over the lump, and two groups: Group-A: VAS≤4, and Group-B: VAS>4. Group B patients in Category iv were randomized into two groups: topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or evening primrose oil+vitamin E. The next line of treatment was tamoxifen 10mg followed by danazol 100mg followed by ormeloxifene 30mg. Results The mean age of 106 participants enrolled was 31.59±10.52 years. The mean scores, using the DASS-42 scale, for depression, anxiety, and stress were 7.31±8.53, 7.08±6.57, and 11.15±8.07, respectively. The depression, anxiety, and stress scores had no significant correlation with pain scores (p =0.84, 0.99, and 0.97 for depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively), or duration (p=0.69, 0.66, and 0.85 for depression, anxiety, and stress, respectively). Twenty-nine of 43 patients (67.44%) responded to topical NSAIDs as first-line treatment, and out of the remaining, 6.98% responded to evening primrose oil + vitamin E, 18.60% to tamoxifen, and 4.65% to danazol. Twenty-nine of 32 patients (90.63%) responded to evening primrose oil+vitamin E as first-line treatment, while 6.25% and 3.12% responded to tamoxifen and danazol, respectively.  Conclusions Both topical NSAIDs and evening primrose oil + vitamin E were found effective first-line treatment options in the majority of patients. Hence, it is always advisable to start such patients on topical NSAIDs, or evening primrose oil + vitamin E, before switching over (if no resolution of pain is reported with these drugs) to higher and more severe treatment options. The duration or severity of pain did not correlate with the psychological condition of the patient.

Indexed as

danazolevening primrose oilmastalgianon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugpsychological assessmenttamoxifentreatment options

Identifiers

PMID38021953
PMCPMC10643197
OpenAlexW4387530344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.