ArticleCureus2023
Evaluating the Safety and Outcomes of Oesophagogastroduodenoscopy in Elderly Patients Presenting With Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Upper gastrointestinal bleeding differences between older and younger adults: should bleeding in non-cirrhotic patients be considered a geriatric syndrome?Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsIn the absence of evidence-based guidelines regarding the safety and appropriateness of emergency endoscopy in elderly, co-morbid and frail patients, we aimed to find clinical outcomes in elderly patients who have undergone gastroscopy following an acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB).
methodsWe carried out a retrospective observational study of patients aged 70 years and older who had undergone emergency oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) at the Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton, United Kingdom, between May 2020 and January 2022. Data collected for analysis included Glasgow-Blatchford score, age, gender, endoscopic findings, endoscopic treatments, immediate complications, 90-day complications, 30-day and 90-day survival, length of hospital stay and re-bleeding.
resultsA total of 248 study participants were categorised into two groups: age 70-79 years (n=102) and ≥80 years (n=146). Melaena (n=226, 91%, p=0.0001) was the commonest indication for emergency OGD in both groups, with the majority of patients presenting with a Glasgow-Blatchford score of ≥1 (n=200, 80.6%, p=0.2). Endoscopy findings were normal in 26.4% (n=27) of those 70-79 years and 32% (n=47) of those ≥80 years (p=0.01). Duodenal ulcer, oesophagitis and gastric ulcer were the commonest abnormal findings (n=50, 20%; n=29, 11.7%; and n=28, 11.3%, respectively). Of the participants, 93.8% (n=212) had no immediate complications. Bleeding and hypotension occurred in 2.7% (n=6) and 2% (n=5) of patients, respectively. At 90 days post-procedure, 83.3% (n=85) of those 70-79 years and 67.8% (n=99) of those ≥80 years had survived (p=0.180).
conclusionsWe conclude that OGD is largely a safe procedure in older adults with acute UGIB; however, the high proportion of OGDs with normal findings reinforces the importance of careful selection of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.