Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38021681›Full record

ReviewCureus2023

Cardiovascular Benefits of Resistance Training in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review.

Anirudh Danduboyina, Binay K Panjiyar, Saatvika R Borra, Sourav S Panicker

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07118410 (Effect of Resistance Exercise With Blood Flow Restriction by Vascular Occlusion on Myocardial Function in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07118410 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Resistance Exercise With Blood Flow Restriction by Vascular Occlusion on Myocardial Function in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de NīmesRan2025 to 2027Enrolled38ConditionsHeart Failure, Ventricular Function, LeftArmsApplication of a vascular restriction device during resistance training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Anirudh DanduboyinaDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gandhi Medical College, Hyderabad, IND.
Binay K PanjiyarDepartment of Internal Medicine, California Institute of Behavioral Neurosciences & Psychology, Fairfield, USA.
Saatvika R BorraDepartment of Internal Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Belagavi, IND.
Sourav S PanickerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, IND.
Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INGandhi Medical College · INGandhi Medical College & Hospital · INJawaharlal Nehru Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases pose a serious problem for health globally. Among these, congestive heart failure is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. According to the recent census, heart failure contributes to a huge financial burden annually. Exercise therapy is an integral part of the non-pharmacological management of heart failure. Due to the availability of various types of exercise therapies and rapid advancements in the existing evidence, it is often challenging to prescribe an appropriate exercise program. Although there is unequivocal evidence supporting the cardiovascular benefits of aerobic therapy, the incorporation of resistance training into exercise regimens should also be encouraged due to its effects on muscular endurance and ameliorating skeletal myopathy in heart failure. In this study, we used a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to give an overview of the current literature and highlight the cardiovascular benefits of resistance training, alone or in combination with aerobic training. We reviewed articles from well-recognized journals published between 2013 and 2023, finally narrowing down to nine selected papers for a thorough analysis. The inclusion criteria comprise studies dealing with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), resistance training alone or in combination with aerobic therapy, and studies available for free in either the PubMed or Google Scholar databases. The systematic review revealed that resistance training in combination with aerobic therapy has greater cardiovascular benefits than either resistance or aerobic therapy alone. A few unique approaches, like periodic intermittent muscular exercise (PRIME) and super circuit training (SCT), have demonstrated an improvement in cardiac and non-cardiac clinical outcomes compared to conventional exercise therapies. Moreover, various factors, like lack of motivation and lack of time, contribute to poor adherence to exercise therapy. Approaches like telerehabilitation and designing exercise regimens with activities that patients enjoy have led to improvements in long-term adherence rates. Nevertheless, further exploration and research by conducting randomized controlled trials on a larger scale is essential to explore the potential of resistance training in the rehabilitation of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and to develop the most effective exercise therapy.

Indexed as

aerobic trainingcombined exercise therapyexercise trainingheart failure with reduced ejection fractionresistance training

Identifiers

PMID38021681
PMCPMC10676736
OpenAlexW4387976942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.