ArticleCureus2023
Late Results of Early End-to-End Repair in Sciatic Nerve Injuries.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advances in sciatic nerve regeneration: A review of contemporary techniques.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Sciatic Nerve Entrapment from Cerclage Wiring in Intramedullary Nail Fixation.The Indian journal of radiology & imaging · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMechanisms of sciatic nerve injury include gunshot injury, sharps injury, injection injury, contusion, femoral fracture injury, and iatrogenic injury due to fracture surgery. Regardless of the type of injury, patients undergoing sciatic nerve repair have poor motor and sensory outcomes. In this study, we compared the late outcomes of a group of patients in whom the author performed an early end-to-end anastomosis for sciatic nerve sharps injury and another group of patients with a similar injury who were not operated on but left to natural history.
methodsThe sciatic nerve, comprising two primary divisions with distinct muscle innervations, was subject to separate examinations. Group 1 (n=10, study group) underwent tibial division anastomosis, while Group 2 (n=12, control group) received no surgical intervention involving the tibial division. Similarly, Group 3 (n=11, study group) underwent peroneal division anastomosis, while Group 4 (n=14, control group) encompassed subgroups that did not undergo peroneal division surgery.
resultsIn Group 1, the rate of gain in plantar flexion muscle strength was significantly higher (p < 0.05) compared to Group 2. Furthermore, the sensory examination gain level ratio within the tibial domain was significantly greater (p < 0.05) in Group 1 than in Group 2. Additionally, Group 1 exhibited a significantly higher rate (p < 0.05) of detection of regeneration and reinnervation findings in electromyography (EMG) compared to Group 2.
conclusionWhen evaluating the long-term outcomes following early end-to-end anastomoses of the sciatic nerve, it becomes evident that while significant improvements are observed when compared to individuals without anastomosis, the positive impact of surgical interventions on motor and sensory gains in daily life remains limited. Nevertheless, we contend that early surgical intervention holds potential advantages in terms of patient management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.