ReviewCureus2023
A Review of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Safety: The Essentials to Patient Safety.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices Among Radiology Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A National Multicentre Study.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Vision foundation model for 3D magnetic resonance imaging segmentation, classification, and registration.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- Establishing an Evidence-based Modern Breast MRI Program.Journal of breast imaging · 2026Review
- Noninvasive Measurement of Cerebrospinal Fluid Flow in Shunted Hydrocephalus: Protocol for Scanner Calibration and Multisite Data Collection.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Roles in brain stimulation, recording and interpreting neuroimaging data: a systematic survey of 26 countries on current practices in EEG, MRI, TCD, TMS and FUS.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- Low-energy ionizing radiation and carcinogenesis: a call for optimized clinical stewardship in the computed tomography era.Ecancermedicalscience · 2026Article
- A practical framework for large-scale neuroimaging data collection in clinically diverse populations: experience from the Stanford Brain Stimulation Lab.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Effect of AI on the Radiologist Workforce: A Task-Based Analysis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Millimeter-scale fluid-driven soft robots.National science review · 2025Article
- Low-field and portable MRI technology: advancements and innovations.European radiology experimental · 2025Review
- Differences in Imaging and Histology Between Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma with and Without Squamous Cell Carcinoma.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Simulation Design of an Elliptical Loop-Microstrip Array for Brain Lobe Imaging with an 11.74 Tesla MRI System.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Timing of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in Moderate and Severe TBI: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A rare case of MRI-induced thermal burn: Clinical implications and safety awareness.Radiology case reports · 2025Article
- Ingested Magnets Found Inadvertently During Elective Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Journal of medical cases · 2024Article
- Stretchable Sensor Materials Applicable to Radiofrequency Coil Design in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Computational Prognostic Modeling in Traumatic Brain Injury.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024Review
- Assessment of patients' knowledge and perceptions of MRI scans and safety in Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- MRI Data Analysis in Malformations of Cortical Development.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nearly 40 million magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are performed each year in the United States. MRI has become a relatively safe non-invasive diagnostic tool. To maintain a safe magnetic resonance (MR) environment, specific policies and safety procedures are required. The four zones of an MR site allow MR personnel to closely monitor and restrict the area. Screening patients with a questionnaire asking about implants, allergies to contrast agents, and other relevant medical information is important to safely perform an MRI scan. Providers may need to consider anesthesia for patients with claustrophobia who are unable to remain motionless. Radiologists and MR personnel need to be aware of some of the risks associated with MR and contrast agents. Safety training and knowledge of the emergency procedures in the MR environment are necessary to safely perform MR examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.