ArticleCureus2023
Assessing Current Interest, Knowledge, and Inquiries About Vasectomies in Urology Patients and Medical Students.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Provider views on vasectomy: cultural, gender, and political elements of Men's decisions to seek publicly funded services.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective Since the overturning of Roe v. Wade, there has been an increased interest in vasectomy procedures. This study aims to analyze interest, knowledge, and inquiries about the vasectomy procedure among urology patients and osteopathic medical students since this overturn. It also seeks to determine if this data varies between the ages and sexes of participants. It is hoped that the findings will aid in the development of a standardized educational plan that might be provided to urologists for future use with patients and their partners. Methods Surveys consisting of 10 questions regarding interests, knowledge, and inquiries about vasectomy procedures and the changes in interest following the Roe v. Wade decision were distributed to urology patients and osteopathic medical students. Results Female students had an increased interest in their current or future male partner obtaining a vasectomy procedure compared to a year ago, whereas older urology patients and male students did not. Based on the responses to the posed queries, the most important information to include in a standardized educational plan for patients is the overall risks and their likelihood, the likelihood of reversal, and the procedure's recovery time and surgical details. Conclusion Female students' increased interest in the vasectomy procedure may be due to the recent overturn of Roe v. Wade. Therefore, physicians must counsel their male patients' female partners or interested females appropriately regarding vasectomies, as more may now be interested. Additionally, an educational plan based on this study's data may be utilized with future urology patients. Placing emphasis on what patients want to know may help ease patient's associated anxiety with their future procedure and strengthen the relationship between the patient and physician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.