Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38021476›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2023

The vascular locked-in and locked-in-plus syndrome: A retrospective case series.

Laura Schnetzer, Jürgen Steinbacher, Gerhard Bauer, Alexander Baden Kunz, Jürgen Bergmann, Martin Kronbichler, Eugen Trinka, Mark McCoy

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura SchnetzerDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Intensive Care and Neurorehabilitation, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Paracelsus Medical University, Ignaz-Harrer-Straße 79, Salzburg A-5020, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8152-7186
Jürgen SteinbacherDepartment of Neuroradiology, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Gerhard BauerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Alexander Baden KunzDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Intensive Care and Neurorehabilitation, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Jürgen BergmannDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Intensive Care and Neurorehabilitation, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Martin KronbichlerNeuroscience Institute, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Eugen TrinkaDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Intensive Care and Neurorehabilitation, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Mark McCoyDepartment of Neurology, Neurological Intensive Care and Neurorehabilitation, Christian Doppler Medical Centre, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
Paracelsus Medical University · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATUniversity of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The locked-in syndrome (LiS) is defined as the loss of most voluntary muscle movements with preserved cognitive abilities due to a ventral pontine lesion. However, some patients may also have severe impairment of consciousness [locked-in plus syndrome (LiPS)]. Here we aimed to explore structural differences between LiS and LiPS patients of vascular aetiology, focusing on lesion patterns and locations to better delineate the clinical spectrum of LiS and LiPS. In this retrospective case series study, we report nine patients (two women), ages 29-74 years (median 50) with LiS and LiPS who were diagnosed between 2007 and 2021. Clinical parameters, MRI findings including the lesioned structures, and a shape feature calculation are presented for every patient. The lesioned structures were determined by a senior neuroradiologist. Two of nine patients had fully retained consciousness (LiS) and seven showed various degrees of impaired consciousness (LiPS). Lesions of LiS patients are round and confined to the pons, whereas lesions of LiPS patients are more elongated and reach neighbouring areas such as the mesencephalon, thalamus or ascending reticular activating system. Lesions involving the mesencephalon and the thalamus are strong indicators of LiPS, whereas for lesions restricted to the pons, the dorsal extension and the associated damage to the ascending reticular activating system are crucial to differentiate LiS from LiPS. Recognizing LiPS using clinical and radiological findings is important as these patients may need different therapies and care and, most importantly, should not be mistaken as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome.

Indexed as

ascending reticular activating systembrainstemconsciousnessmesencephalonmorphometryponsthalamus

Identifiers

PMID38021476
PMCPMC10655646
OpenAlexW4388739448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.