ArticleEnvironmental science and ecotechnology2024
Data-driven interpretable analysis for polysaccharide yield prediction.
Article in Environmental science and ecotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review on Xylooligosaccharides Production From Lignocellulosic Biomass: Strategies, Applications, and Challenges.ChemSusChem · 2026Review
- Augmented machine learning for sewage quality assessment with limited data.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence is transforming the research paradigm of environmental science and engineering.Environmental science and ecotechnology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cornstalks show promise as a raw material for polysaccharide production through xylanase. Rapid and accurate prediction of polysaccharide yield can facilitate process optimization, eliminating the need for extensive experimentation in actual production to refine reaction conditions, thereby saving time and costs. However, the intricate interplay of enzymatic factors poses challenges in predicting and optimizing polysaccharide yield accurately. Here, we introduce an innovative data-driven approach leveraging multiple artificial intelligence techniques to enhance polysaccharide production. We propose a machine learning framework to identify highly accurate polysaccharide yield prediction modeling methods and uncover optimal enzymatic parameter combinations. Notably, Random Forest (RF) and eXtreme Gradient Boost (XGB) demonstrate robust performance, achieving prediction accuracies of 93.0% and 95.6%, respectively, while an independently developed deep neural network (DNN) model achieves 91.1% accuracy. A feature importance analysis of XGB reveals the enzyme solution volume's dominant role (43.7%), followed by time (20.7%), substrate concentration (15%), temperature (15%), and pH (5.6%). Further interpretability analysis unveils complex parameter interactions and potential optimization strategies. This data-driven approach, incorporating machine learning, deep learning, and interpretable analysis, offers a viable pathway for polysaccharide yield prediction and the potential recovery of various agricultural residues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.