Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38021317›Full record

ArticleGroup processes & intergroup relations : GPIR2023

Stereotypes shape response competition when forming impressions.

Neil Hester, Sally Y Xie, Jeannine Alana Bertin, Eric Hehman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Group processes & intergroup relations : GPIR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Neil HesterDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3025-766X
Sally Y XieDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Canada.
Jeannine Alana BertinDepartment of Psychology, New York University, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9296-8091
Eric HehmanDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic models of impression formation posit that bottom-up factors (e.g., a target's facial features) and top-down factors (e.g., perceiver knowledge of stereotypes) continuously interact over time until a stable categorization or impression emerges. Most previous work on the dynamic resolution of judgments over time has focused on either categorization (e.g., "is this person male/female?") or specific trait impressions (e.g., "is this person trustworthy?"). In two mousetracking studies-exploratory (

Indexed as

dynamic interactive modelsmousetrackingperson perceptionstereotyping

Identifiers

PMID38021317
PMCPMC10665134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.