ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023
Effect of Purposely Induced Asymmetric Walking Perturbations on Limb Loading After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoupling speed matters: Optimizing gait mechanics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with Split-belt adaptation training of the healthy leg.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2026Article
- Gait after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction fails to exhibit task-sensitive modulations of dynamic stability: A preliminary analysis.Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients often sustain prolonged neuromuscular dysfunction after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This dysfunction can present as interlimb loading rate asymmetries linked to reinjury and knee osteoarthritis progression. Purpose/Hypothesis: To evaluate how asymmetric walking protocols can reduce interlimb loading rate asymmetry in patients after ACLR. It was hypothesized that asymmetric walking perturbations would (1) produce a short-term adaptation of interlimb gait symmetry and (2) induce the temporary storage of these new gait patterns after the perturbations were removed. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Fifteen patients who had undergone ACLR were asked to perform an asymmetric walking protocol during the study period (2022-2023). First, to classify each limb as overloaded or underloaded based on the vertical ground-reaction force loading rate for each limb, participants were asked to perform baseline symmetric walking trials. Participants then performed an asymmetric walking trial for 10 minutes, where one limb was moving 0.5 m/s faster than the other limb (1 vs 1.5 m/s), followed by a 2-minute 1 m/s symmetric deadaptation walking trial. This process was repeated with the limb speeds switched for a second asymmetric trial. Results: Participants adopted a new, symmetric interlimb loading rate gait pattern over time in response to the asymmetric trial, where the overloaded limb was set at 1 m/s. A linear mixed-effects model detected a significant change in gait dynamics ( Conclusion: Asymmetric walking successfully produced the short-term adaptation of interlimb loading rate symmetry in patients after ACLR and induced the temporary storage of these gait patterns in the initial period when the perturbation was removed. Clinical Relevance: These findings are promising, as they suggest that asymmetric walking could serve as an effective gait retraining protocol that has the potential to improve long-term outcomes in patients after ACLR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.