Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38021309›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2023

Continuous Vertical Inside-Out Versus Traditional Vertical Inside-Out Meniscal Repair: A Biomechanical Comparison.

José Leonardo Rocha de Faria, Arthur Paiva Grimaldi Santos, Douglas Mello Pavão, Mariana Radulski, Ana Carolina Leal, Ari Digiácomo Ocampo More, Alan de Paula Mozella, João Antonio Matheus Guimarães, Robert F LaPrade, Carlos Rodrigo de Mello Roesler and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Hybrid Sequential Meniscal Suture Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

José Leonardo Rocha de FariaKnee Surgery Center, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Arthur Paiva Grimaldi SantosBiomechanical Engineering Laboratory of Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Douglas Mello PavãoKnee Surgery Center, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Mariana RadulskiMedical School of Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Ana Carolina LealResearch Division, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Ari Digiácomo Ocampo MoreBiomechanical Engineering Laboratory of Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Alan de Paula MozellaKnee Surgery Center, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
João Antonio Matheus GuimarãesResearch Division, National Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics (INTO), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Robert F LaPradeTwin Cities Orthopaedics, Edina, Minnesota, USA.
Carlos Rodrigo de Mello RoeslerBiomechanical Engineering Laboratory of Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Rodrigo SalimSchool of Medicine from University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BRInstituto Nacional de Traumatologia e Ortopedia · BRUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biomechanical assessment of meniscal repairs is essential for evaluating different meniscal suturing methods and techniques. The continuous meniscal suture technique is a newer method of meniscal repair that may have biomechanical differences compared with traditional techniques. Purpose: To evaluate the displacement, stiffness after cyclical loading, and load to failure for a continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture versus a traditional vertical inside-out meniscal suture in a porcine medial meniscus. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 28 porcine knees were acquired and divided into 2 test groups of 14 medial meniscus each. A 2.0-cm longitudinal red-white zone cut was made in the body of the medial meniscus for each knee. The continuous suture (CS) group received 4 vertical stitches performed with a continuous vertical meniscal suture technique, and the inside-out suture (IO) group received a traditional vertical suture with 4 stitches. Two traction tapes were passed between the sutures and positioned in the biomechanical testing fixture device. Each specimen underwent load-to-failure testing at 5 mm/s, and displacement, system stiffness, and maximum load to failure were compared between the groups. Results: The displacement after the cyclic test was 0.53 ± 0.12 and 0.48 ± 0.07 mm for the CS and IO groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between the groups ( Conclusion: A continuous vertical meniscal suture created a configuration for treating longitudinal meniscal lesions that was beneficial and biomechanically similar to a traditional vertical suture technique. Clinical Relevance: The study findings indicate that use of the continuous vertical inside-out meniscal suture technique is a possible therapeutic option.

Indexed as

biomechanicsinside-outmeniscal repairprimary fixation

Identifiers

PMID38021309
PMCPMC10644761
OpenAlexW4388618628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.