ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Sociodemographic Factors Related to Adverse Donor Reactions in Shenzhen.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence-based predictive models for adverse blood donor reactions: a systematic review of immediate and delayed events and clinical data approaches.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Profile and risk factors of blood donors who experienced adverse reactions: a cross-sectional study on donor hemovigilance data reported to the national network from 2020 to 2022 in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The adverse donor reaction (ADR) means the uncomfortable feeling felt by blood donors during the whole process of blood donation, which can affect the blood donation behavior of blood donors. So, it is very necessary for blood centers to monitor and prevent it. Methods: Data about ADRs in Shenzhen Blood Center from January 2018 to December 2022 were collected, and correlation analysis was conducted using SPSS 24.0 software. Results: From January 2018 to December 2022, a total of 1265 ADRs occurred in 642,767 blood donations in Shenzhen Blood Center, with an incidence of 0.20%. Most of the ADRs were mild and occurred during blood collections (>90%). The ADR rate of young individuals aged 18-29 years old was the highest ( Conclusion: The occurrence of ADRs is related to the sociodemographic factors of blood donors, including age, donation type, donation history, and donation sites. Shenzhen Blood Centers should pay special attention to the process of blood donation among young blood donors aged 18-29 years old, first-time blood donors, whole-blood donors, and blood donors who donate at mobile sites to further reduce the occurrence of ADRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.