Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38021035›Full record

ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2023

Addressing antimicrobial resistance through community engagement: a framework for developing contextually relevant and impactful behaviour change interventions.

Jessica Mitchell, Helen Hawkings, Sophia Latham, Fariza Fieroze, Abriti Arjyal, Dani Jennifer Barrington, Sushil Baral, Md Badruddin Saify, Paul Cooke, Prudence Hamade and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jessica MitchellNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute for Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2892-4630
Helen HawkingsMalaria Consortium, The Green House 244-254 Cambridge Heath Rd, London EC2 9DA, UK.
Sophia LathamDepartment of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Chester High Road, Neston CH64 7TE, UK.
Fariza FierozeARK Foundation, Suite C3 & C4, House 06, Road 109, Gulshan-2, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Abriti ArjyalHERD International, Bhaisepati, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Dani Jennifer BarringtonSchool of Population and Global Health, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley 6009, Western Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1486-9247
Sushil BaralHERD International, Bhaisepati, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Md Badruddin SaifyARK Foundation, Suite C3 & C4, House 06, Road 109, Gulshan-2, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Paul CookeFaculty of Arts and Humanities, Centre for World Cinemas and Digital Cultures, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Prudence HamadeMalaria Consortium, The Green House 244-254 Cambridge Heath Rd, London EC2 9DA, UK.
Rumana HuqueARK Foundation, Suite C3 & C4, House 06, Road 109, Gulshan-2, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh.
Ayuska ParajuliHERD International, Bhaisepati, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Amam Zonaed SiddikiFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chattogram Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Chattogram 4225, Bangladesh.
Rebecca KingNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, Leeds Institute for Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Woodhouse, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Community engagement (CE) interventions often explore and promote behaviour change around a specific challenge. Suggestions for behaviour change should be co-produced in partnership with the community. To facilitate this, it is essential that the intervention includes key content that unpacks the challenge of interest via multiple sources of knowledge. However, where community lived experience and academic evidence appear misaligned, tensions can appear within the co-production dynamic of CE. This is specifically so within the context of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) where ideal behaviours are often superseded by what is practical or possible in a particular community context. Methods: Here we describe a framework for the equitable development of contextually appropriate, clearly evidenced behavioural objectives for CE interventions. This framework explores different sources of knowledge on AMR, including the potentially competing views of different stakeholders. Findings: The framework allows key content on AMR to be selected based upon academic evidence, contextual appropriateness and fit to the chosen CE approach. A case study of the framework in action exemplifies how the framework is applicable to a range of contexts, CE approaches and One Health topics beyond just AMR. Conclusions: Within CE interventions, academic evidence is crucial to develop well-informed key content. However, this formative work should also involve community members, ensuring that their contextual knowledge is valued. The type of CE approach also needs careful consideration because methodological constraints may limit the breadth and depth of information that can be delivered within an intervention, and thus the scope of key content.

Identifiers

PMID38021035
PMCPMC10673675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.