Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38021015›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2023

Does the choice of chemoprophylaxis affect the prevention of deep vein thrombosis in lumbar fusion surgery? A systematic review of the literature.

Sathish Muthu, Georgios Mavrovounis, Stipe Corluka, Zorica Buser, Giovanni Barbanti Brodano, Yabin Wu, Hans-Jorg Meisel, Jeffrey Wang, S Tim Yoon, Andreas K Demetriades and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Sathish MuthuDepartment of Spine Surgery, Orthopaedic Research Group, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Georgios MavrovounisDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
Stipe CorlukaSpinal surgery Division, Department of Traumatology, University Hospital Centre Sestre milosrdnice, Zagreb, Croatia.
Zorica BuserGerling Institute, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
Giovanni Barbanti BrodanoIRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, IT, Italy.
Yabin WuResearch Department, AO Spine International, Davos, Switzerland.
Hans-Jorg MeiselBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Germany.
Jeffrey WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, CA, USA.
S Tim YoonDepartment of Orthopaedics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Andreas K DemetriadesEdinburgh Spinal Surgery Outcome Studies Group, Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Infirmary Edinburgh, UK.
AO Spine Knowledge Forum Degenerative
AO Foundation · CHBG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle · DEEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBEmory University · USIstituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITNew York University · USOrthopaedic Research Group · INUniversity of Applied Health Sciences · HRUniversity of Southern California · USUniversity of Thessaly · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: To date, the available guidance on venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in elective lumbar fusion surgery is largely open to surgeon interpretation and preference without any specific suggested chemoprophylactic regimen. Research question: This study aimed to comparatively analyze the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) with the use of commonly employed chemoprophylactic agents such as unfractionated heparin (UH) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in lumbar fusion surgery. Material and methods: An independent systematic review of four scientific databases (PubMed, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science) was performed to identify relevant articles as per the preferred reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting on DVT/PE outcomes of lumbar fusion surgery in adult patients with UH or LMWH chemoprophylaxis were included for analysis. Analysis was performed using the Stata software. Results: Twelve studies with 8495 patients were included in the analysis. A single-arm meta-analysis of the included studies found a DVT incidence of 14% (95%CI [8%-20%]) and 1% (95%CI [-6% - 8%]) with LMWH and UH respectively. Both the chemoprophylaxis agents prevented PE with a noted incidence of 0% (95%CI [0%-0.1%]) and 0% (95%CI [0%-1%]) with LMWH and UH respectively. The risk of bleeding-related complications with the usage of LMWH and UH was 0% (95% CI [0.0%-0.30%]) and 3% (95% CI [0.3%-5%]) respectively. Discussion and conclusion: Both LMWH and UH reduces the overall incidence of DVT/PE, but there is a paucity of evidence analyzing the comparative effectiveness of the chemoprophylaxis regimens in lumbar fusion procedures. The heterogeneity in data prevents any conclusions, as there remains an evidence gap. We recommend future high-quality randomized controlled trials to investigate in this regard to help develop recommendations on thromboprophylaxis usage.

Indexed as

ChemoprophylaxisDeep vein thrombosisHeparinLMWHLow-molecular-weight heparinLumbar fusionPulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID38021015
PMCPMC10668088
OpenAlexW4388672900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.