ArticleBrain & spine2023
Improving tractography in brainstem cavernoma patients by distortion correction.
Article in Brain & spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diffusion-based generative fiber orientation restoration from severe signal loss in diffusion-weighted MRI.Medical image analysis · 2026Article
- Large Pontine Cavernoma with Hemorrhage: Case Report on Surgical Approach and Recovery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The resection of brainstem cerebral cavernous malformations (CCM) harbors the risk of damaging the corticospinal tract (CST) and other major tracts. Hence, visualization of eloquent fiber tracts supports pre- and intraoperative planning. However, diffusion tensor imaging fiber tracking at brainstem level suffers from distortion due to field inhomogeneities and eddy currents by steep diffusion gradients. Research question: This study aims to analyze the effect of distortion correction for CST tractography in brainstem CCM patients. Material and methods: 25 patients who underwent resection of brainstem CCM were enrolled, 24 suffered from hemorrhage. We performed an anatomically based tractography of the CST with a mean minimal fractional anisotropy of 0.22 ± 0.04 before and after cranial distortion correction (CDC). Accuracy was measured by anatomical plausibility and aberrant fibers. Results: CDC led to a more precise CST tractography, further approximating its assumed anatomical localization in all cases. CDC resulted in a significantly more ventral location of the CST of 1.5 ± 0.6 mm (6.1 ± 2.7 mm before CDC vs. 4.6 ± 2.1 mm after CDC; p < .0001) as measured by the distance to the basilar artery and of 1.7 ± 0.6 mm (8.9 ± 2.7 mm vs. 7.2 ± 2.1 mm; p < .0001) in relation to the clivus. Aberrant fibers were reduced by CDC in 44% of cases. We found a mean difference in CST volume of 0.6 ± 0.8 ccm. We could not detect motor deficits after resection of irregular fibers. Discussion and conclusion: CDC effectively corrects tractography for distortion at brainstem level, especially in patients suffering from brainstem CCM, further approximating its actual anatomical localization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.