Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38021007›Full record

ReviewBrain & spine2023

A systematic review of middle meningeal artery embolization for minimally symptomatic chronic subdural haematomas that do not require immediate evacuation.

Alvaro Rojas-Villabona, Saffwan Mohamed, Oliver Kennion, Rajeev Padmanabhan, Aslam Siddiqui, Manjunath Prasad, Nitin Mukerji

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain & spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06274580 (Endovascular vs Conservative Treatment in Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematomas and Mild Symptoms), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06274580 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Endovascular vs Conservative Treatment in Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematomas and Mild Symptoms: a Multicentre Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorOspedale Policlinico San MartinoRan2024 to 2026Enrolled300ConditionsSubdural Hematoma, ChronicArmsembolization of the middle meningeal artery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alvaro Rojas-VillabonaDepartment of Neurosurgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Saffwan MohamedDepartment of Neurosurgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Oliver KennionDepartment of Neurosurgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Rajeev PadmanabhanDepartment of Neuroradiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Aslam SiddiquiDepartment of Neuroradiology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Manjunath PrasadDepartment of Neurosurgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Nitin MukerjiDepartment of Neurosurgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
James Cook University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Embolization of the Middle Meningeal Artery (EMMA) is an emerging treatment option for patients with Chronic Subdural Haematoma (CSDH). Questions: (1) Can EMMA change the natural history of untreated minimally symptomatic CSDH which do not require immediate evacuation? (2) What is the role of EMMA in the prevention of recurrence following surgical treatment? (3) Can the procedure be performed under local anaesthetic? Material and methods: Systematic literature review. No randomised clinical trials available on EMMA for meta-analysis. Results: Six unique large cohorts with more than 50 embolisations were identified (evidence: 3b-4). EMMA can control the progression of surgically naïve CSDH in 91.1-100% of the patients, in which haematoma expansion is halted, or the lesion decreases and resolves. Treatment failure requiring surgery occurs in 0-4.1% of the patients having EMMA as the primary and only treatment. Treatment failure requiring surgery goes up slightly to 6.8% if post-surgical patients are included. When EMMA is used as postsurgical adjunctive the risk of recurrence is 1.4-8.9% compared to 10-20% in surgical series. EMMA has minimal morbidity and it is feasible under local anaesthesia or slight sedation in the majority of cases. Conclusion: There is cumulative low-quality evidence in the literature that EMMA may be able to modify the natural course of the disease. It appears effective in controlling progression of CSDHs in patients having it as a primary standing alone treatment and it reduces the risk of recurrence and the need for surgical intervention in refractory postsurgical cases or as a postsurgical adjunctive treatment with minimal morbidity (recommendation: C).

Indexed as

Chronic subdural haematomaEmbolizationMiddle meningeal arteryTherapeutic

Identifiers

PMID38021007
PMCPMC10668091
OpenAlexW4386475416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.