Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020983›Full record

ArticleBrain & spine2023

Development and external validation of clinical prediction models for pituitary surgery.

Olivier Zanier, Matteo Zoli, Victor E Staartjes, Mohammed O Alalfi, Federica Guaraldi, Sofia Asioli, Arianna Rustici, Ernesto Pasquini, Marco Faustini-Fustini, Zoran Erlic and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain & spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Olivier ZanierMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Matteo ZoliIRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna. Programma Neurochirurgia Ipofisi - Pituitary Unit, Bologna, Italy.
Victor E StaartjesMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mohammed O AlalfiUniversity of Bologna, School of Medicine and Surgery, Bologna, Italy.
Federica GuaraldiIRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna. Programma Neurochirurgia Ipofisi - Pituitary Unit, Bologna, Italy.
Sofia AsioliDepartment of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences (DIBINEM), University of Bologna, Italy.
Arianna RusticiDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Italy.
Ernesto PasquiniAzienda USL di Bologna, Bellaria Hospital, ENT Unit, Bologna, Italy.
Marco Faustini-FustiniIRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna. Programma Neurochirurgia Ipofisi - Pituitary Unit, Bologna, Italy.
Zoran ErlicDepartment of Endocrinology, Diabetology and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital Zurich (USZ) and University of Zurich (UZH), Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael HugelshoferMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Stefanos VoglisMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Luca RegliMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Diego MazzatentaIRCCS Istituto Delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna. Programma Neurochirurgia Ipofisi - Pituitary Unit, Bologna, Italy.
Carlo SerraMachine Intelligence in Clinical Neuroscience (MICN) Laboratory, Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gross total resection (GTR), Biochemical Remission (BR) and restitution of a priorly disrupted hypothalamus pituitary axis (new improvement, IMP) are important factors in pituitary adenoma (PA) resection surgery. Prediction of these metrics using simple and preoperatively available data might help improve patient care and contribute to a more personalized medicine. Research question: This study aims to develop machine learning models predicting GTR, BR, and IMP in PA resection surgery, using preoperatively available data. Material and methods: With data from patients undergoing endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for PAs machine learning models for prediction of GTR, BR and IMP were developed and externally validated. Development was carried out on a registry from Bologna, Italy while external validation was conducted using patient data from Zurich, Switzerland. Results: The model development cohort consisted of 1203 patients. GTR was achieved in 207 (17.2%, 945 (78.6%) missing), BR in 173 (14.4%, 992 (82.5%) missing) and IMP in 208 (17.3%, 167 (13.9%) missing) cases. In the external validation cohort 206 patients were included and GTR was achieved in 121 (58.7%, 32 (15.5%) missing), BR in 46 (22.3%, 145 (70.4%) missing) and IMP in 42 (20.4%, 7 (3.4%) missing) cases. The AUC at external validation amounted to 0.72 (95% CI: 0.63-0.80) for GTR, 0.69 (0.52-0.83) for BR, as well as 0.82 (0.76-0.89) for IMP. Discussion and conclusion: All models showed adequate generalizability, performing similarly in training and external validation, confirming the possible potentials of machine learning in helping to adapt surgical therapy to the individual patient.

Indexed as

AdenomaMachine learningOutcome predictionPituitary surgeryTranssphenoidal surgery

Identifiers

PMID38020983
PMCPMC10668061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.