ArticleBrain & spine2023
Visual acuity in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenoma: Prognostic factors and long-term outcome after surgery.
Article in Brain & spine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding visual pathway damage in pituitary macroadenomas: insights from retinal nerve fiber layer and visual field analysis.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary management of pituitary macroadenoma.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
- Insights into Visual Outcomes and Determinants in Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: A 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Clinical efficacy of optical coherence tomography parameters to predict the visual field outcome following pituitary adenoma surgery.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Visual acuity (VA) and visual field defects (VF) are evaluated in the preoperative management of non-functioning pituitary adenoma (NFPA). The former is less studied than the latter. Research question: To analyze preoperative factors, including adenoma volumetry, associated with reduced VA and postoperative improvement of VA over five years after surgery. Methods: Eighty-seven patients who had primary surgery for NFPA were retrospectively reviewed. Eyes were categorized by best/worse preoperative VA. Ophthalmology review was performed before surgery, at three months, one to two years, and five years post-surgery. Results: Reduced VA in any eye was present in 55%. VA of the worse eye improved in 77% and normalized in 54%. The majority improved within three months. Additional cases with VA improvement were seen at 1-2 years after surgery. No further improvement was seen five years after surgery. Fifty percent of patients with, per definition, normal preoperative VA showed improved VA postoperatively. Tumor height above the sella in the sagittal plane was the best radiological predictor of reduced VA. Volumetry did not add to accuracy. Age, sagittal tumor height and visual field defects were risk factors of preoperative reduced VA. No predictors of postoperative recovery were identified. Conclusion: Half of patients with reduced VA recover fully. All patients, independent of age and degree of VA reduction, may improve. No predictors of recovery were found. Early improvement is common and improvement beyond two years is unlikely. The frequency of reduced VA is underestimated. The present results could be of value in pre- and postoperative counseling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.