ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023
Application of Copy Number Variation Sequencing Technology in 422 Foetuses with Abnormal Ultrasound Soft Markers.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adaptive Fast-Slow Large Language Model Framework for Multidimensional Classification of Prenatal Ultrasound Reports: Comparative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Prenatal SNP-array chromosomal microarray analysis in 3,549 pregnancies: indication-specific yields and clinical implications.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Fetal Copy Number Variant Detection in Pregnancies with Ultrasound Soft Markers: A Maternal Age-Stratified Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Molecular genetic and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with increased Nuchal Translucency.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The application value of ultrasound soft indicators in prenatal diagnosis was evaluated by copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq). Methods: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of 422 pregnant women who underwent CNV-seq testing at Luoyang Maternal and Child Health Hospital between January 2020 and November 2021. The women had presented with abnormal ultrasound soft markers; those identified as high-risk through non-invasive prenatal screening were excluded. Results: A total of 43 abnormal cases were detected in 422 pregnant women, including 24 aneuploidy (including chimerism) and 19 pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs). Based on the characteristics of ultrasound soft indicators, pregnant women were divided into five groups: isolated nuchal translucency (NT) group, combined NT group, isolated soft indicators group, combined soft indicators group and combined non-NT group. The abnormality detection rates in the five groups were 12.38% (13/105), 36.11% (13/36), 3.74% (4/103), 3.08% (2/63) and 10.09% (11/109), respectively. Statistical tests showed that the detection rate in the NT thickening combined with other abnormalities group was significantly higher than the other four groups, while there was no statistical difference in the detection rate among the other four groups. Conclusion: When NT thickening is combined with other abnormalities, it is more likely to indicate chromosome abnormalities or CNVs, so it should be regarded seriously upon finding, and pregnant women should be referred for prenatal diagnosis according to the examination results. In addition, NT thickening is an important indicator for prenatal diagnosis and should be considered regardless of whether it occurs independently. The authors recommend CNV-seq for prenatal diagnosis to prevent missing small fragments of CNVs during traditional karyotyping.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.