Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020941›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023

Validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition for Use in Uganda.

Catherine Atuhaire, Laura Brennaman, Grace Nambozi, Kabanda Taseera, Esther C Atukunda, Joseph Ngonzi, Daniel Atwine, Lynn T Matthews, Godfrey Zari Rukundo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Catherine AtuhaireDepartment of Nursing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Laura BrennamanDepartment of Nursing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Grace NamboziDepartment of Nursing, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Kabanda TaseeraDepartment of Microbiology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Esther C AtukundaDepartment of Pharmacy, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-0045-0138
Joseph NgonziDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Daniel AtwineSOAR Research Foundation, Mbarara, Uganda.
Lynn T MatthewsDivision of Infectious Diseases and Center for Global Health Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Godfrey Zari RukundoDepartment of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-3739-1426

Funding

Partnership for Global Health Research Training Program (Renewal)-Supplement for OBSSR, NCI, NCI-AIDS and NIDCDD43TW010543 · FIC · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Wafaie W Fawzi, DAVIDSON HOWES HAMER · 2017 to 2026
$12.1M
Integration of a patient-centered mobile health intervention (Support-Moms) into routine antenatal care to improve maternal health in UgandaR01HD111692 · NICHD · MBARARA UNIVERSITY/SCIENCE/ TECHNOLOGY · PI Esther Cathyln Atukunda · 2023 to 2026
$1.9M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW010543NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD111692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a widely acknowledged screening tool for postpartum depression (PPD) globally, but its validation in Uganda has been lacking. This study aimed to assess the EPDS's accuracy as a PPD screening tool in Uganda compared to the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI 7.0.2) based on the DSM-5. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at a referral hospital and two peri-urban primary care postpartum clinics in rural southwestern Uganda. We enrolled 287 mothers aged 18 to 49 at their six-week postpartum visit. The EPDS was used for initial screening, and the MINI 7.0.2 was employed for clinical diagnosis. The study used the Runyankore-Rukiga language version of the EPDS and collected data from November 11, 2019, to June 10, 2020, with the MINI 7.0.2 as the reference standard. Results: The overall PPD prevalence was 29.5%, as opposed to 26.5% with EPDS and MINI 7.0.2 DSM-5 criteria (p = 0.239). The EPDS demonstrated a sensitivity of 86.8%, specificity of 92.1%, positive predictive value of 80.5%, and negative predictive value of 94.9%. A cutoff score of ≥10 was found to be the most effective acceptable point after drawing the AUC of ROC and determining the most appropriate point using Youden's index. The area under the ROC curve, indicating the scale's overall performance against MINI 7.0.2, was 0.89 for Bwizibwera HCIV, 0.97 for Kinoni HCIV, and 0.84 for MRRH. In conclusion, the EPDS can effectively screen for postpartum depression in southwestern Uganda using a cutoff score of ≥10. It exhibits strong diagnostic performance in correctly identifying PPD in postpartum mothers.

Indexed as

DSM-5EPDSMINIpostpartum depressionvalidation

Identifiers

PMID38020941
PMCPMC10676086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.