ArticleInternational journal of women's health2023
Validating the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale Against the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition for Use in Uganda.
Article in International journal of women's health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy of mental health screening tools applicable to adolescents in sub-Saharan Africa.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- An mHealth-based social support program to improve antenatal care engagement and facility-based births in Uganda: A type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation clinical trial.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Point prevalence and incidence of depressive and generalized anxiety symptoms among women attending antenatal clinics, a longitudinal study among adolescent mothers in Mwanza Tanzania.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Postpartum Depression in Adolescents in an Urban Teen Clinic.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- Cross-Sectional Study of Mothers' Perception of Postpartum Visit Benefit by Rural Status.Journal of prenatal & perinatal psychology & health · 2025Article
- Translation and Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for Eritrea: A Screening Tool for Postpartum Depression in Primary Health Care Facilities.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Assessing the Quality of Maternal Mental Illness Care Across Maternity Care Settings in Southwestern Uganda.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Luganda Edinburgh Postnatal depression scale: cross-cultural adaptation and validation for prenatal screening of depression in a Ugandan sample.African health sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Maternal mental health screening and management by health workers in southwestern Uganda: a qualitative analysis of knowledge, practices, and challenges.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is a widely acknowledged screening tool for postpartum depression (PPD) globally, but its validation in Uganda has been lacking. This study aimed to assess the EPDS's accuracy as a PPD screening tool in Uganda compared to the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI 7.0.2) based on the DSM-5. Methods: This was a descriptive cross-sectional study conducted at a referral hospital and two peri-urban primary care postpartum clinics in rural southwestern Uganda. We enrolled 287 mothers aged 18 to 49 at their six-week postpartum visit. The EPDS was used for initial screening, and the MINI 7.0.2 was employed for clinical diagnosis. The study used the Runyankore-Rukiga language version of the EPDS and collected data from November 11, 2019, to June 10, 2020, with the MINI 7.0.2 as the reference standard. Results: The overall PPD prevalence was 29.5%, as opposed to 26.5% with EPDS and MINI 7.0.2 DSM-5 criteria (p = 0.239). The EPDS demonstrated a sensitivity of 86.8%, specificity of 92.1%, positive predictive value of 80.5%, and negative predictive value of 94.9%. A cutoff score of ≥10 was found to be the most effective acceptable point after drawing the AUC of ROC and determining the most appropriate point using Youden's index. The area under the ROC curve, indicating the scale's overall performance against MINI 7.0.2, was 0.89 for Bwizibwera HCIV, 0.97 for Kinoni HCIV, and 0.84 for MRRH. In conclusion, the EPDS can effectively screen for postpartum depression in southwestern Uganda using a cutoff score of ≥10. It exhibits strong diagnostic performance in correctly identifying PPD in postpartum mothers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.