Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020851›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2023

Radiographic cervical spine injury patterns in admitted blunt trauma patients with and without prehospital spinal motion restriction.

Susan Jao, Zhe Wang, Ambika Mukhi, Neeta Chaudhary, Jonathan Martin, Victoria Yuan, Robert Laskowski, Emily Huang, James Vosswinkel, Adam J Singer and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susan JaoStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Zhe WangStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Ambika MukhiStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8994-2034
Neeta ChaudharyStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Jonathan MartinStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Victoria YuanStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Robert LaskowskiStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Emily HuangStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
James VosswinkelStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Adam J SingerEmergency Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.
Randeep JawaStony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4482-4699
Stony Brook University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Selective prehospital cervical spine motion restriction (C-SMR) following blunt trauma has increasingly been used by emergency medical service (EMS) providers. We determined rates of prehospital C-SMR and concomitant radiographic injury patterns. Methods: A retrospective trauma registry and chart review was conducted for all adult blunt trauma patients who were transported by EMS and hospitalized with radiographic cervical spine injuries from 2011 to 2019 at a level 1 trauma center. Results: Of 658 admitted blunt trauma patients with confirmed cervical spine injury by imaging, 117 (17.8%) did not receive prehospital C-SMR. Patients without prehospital C-SMR were significantly older (76 vs 54 years), more often had low fall as mechanism of injury (59.8% vs 15.9%) and had lower Injury Severity Score (10 vs 17). Patients without C-SMR (Non-SMR) experienced the full array of cervical spine injury types and locations. While the non-SMR patients most often had dens fractures,C-SMR patients most often had C7 fractures; frequencies of fractures at the remaining vertebral levels were comparable. On MRI, cervical spinal cord (8.5% vs 19.6%) and ligamentous injuries (5.1% vs 12.6%) occurred less often in non-SMR patients. Approximately 8.5% of non-SMR patients and 20% of C-SMR patients required cervical spine surgery. Conclusion: Patients without prehospital C-SMR demonstrate a broad array of cervical spine injuries. While the rates of certain cervical injuries are lower in prehospital non-SMR patients, they are not insignificant. Level of evidence: Level III.

Indexed as

cervical spineimmobilization

Identifiers

PMID38020851
PMCPMC10668292
OpenAlexW4388871134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.