Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020843›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nursing sciences2023

Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of peer support among disadvantaged groups: A rapid scoping review.

Kalina Mikolajczak-Degrauwe, Sybren R Slimmen, Dylan Gillissen, Petra de Bil, Valerie Bosmans, Corrine Keemink, Inge Meyvis, Yvonne J Kuipers

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nursing sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Qualitative Examination of the Content Validity of the EQ-5D-5L and EQ-5D-Y-3L in Adult and Paediatric Patients With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kalina Mikolajczak-DegrauweResearch Group Healthy Region, HZ University of Applied Sciences, Vlissingen, Netherlands.
Sybren R SlimmenResearch Group Healthy Region, HZ University of Applied Sciences, Vlissingen, Netherlands.
Dylan GillissenResearch Group Healthy Region, HZ University of Applied Sciences, Vlissingen, Netherlands.
Petra de BilResearch Group Healthy Region, HZ University of Applied Sciences, Vlissingen, Netherlands.
Valerie BosmansDepartment of Health and Social Studies, School of Midwifery, Artesis Plantijn University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.
Corrine KeeminkDepartment of Health and Social Studies, School of Midwifery, Artesis Plantijn University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.
Inge MeyvisDepartment of Health and Social Studies, School of Midwifery, Artesis Plantijn University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.
Yvonne J KuipersDepartment of Health and Social Studies, School of Midwifery, Artesis Plantijn University of Applied Sciences, Antwerp, Belgium.
Artesis Plantijn Hogeschool Antwerpen · BEHZ University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the current state of knowledge and evidence about peer support for various disadvantaged groups; to identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of peer support to critically reflect on peer support within health and social services. Methods: A rapid scoping review was conducted according to Arksey and O'Malley's framework, aiming to identify eligible studies in PubMed, APA PsychInfo, Education Resources Information Center, Cochrane Library, Academic Search Premier, ScienceDirect, Directory of Open Access Journals, ResearchGate, WorldCat, and Google Scholar. According to Rodgers' concept analysis steps and the SWOT model, data was reported using thematic synthesis. Results: Forty-five studies were included, describing a variety of peer support initiatives among groups of young migrants and unsupervised minors, young adults with autism, people with (mental) health problems, foster/shelter families, vulnerable pregnant women, people outside the labour force, older adults, and homeless people. The strength of peer support is its positive effect on the quality of life among vulnerable people. The weakness is represented by peers both being too involved and focused on personal interest or by peers lacking expertise and knowledge. Opportunities for peer support are mutual learning, the anticipated long-term effects, and the potential to facilitate social inclusion. Culture, language barriers, drop-out rates, securing sustainability, and peers' lack of time and commitment are regarded as threats to peer support. Conclusion: Although peer support offers good outcomes for various groups of vulnerable people, the weaknesses and threats need to be considered to provide and proliferate peer support.

Indexed as

Peer supportScoping reviewSociological factorsVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID38020843
PMCPMC10667317
OpenAlexW4386777566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.