ReviewCurrent research in neurobiology2023
Stuttering as a spectrum disorder: A hypothesis.
Review in Current research in neurobiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural Brain Correlates of Speech Disfluency in Early Childhood: A Dimensional Analysis in a Population-Based Cohort.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Using the DIVA model to better understand speech motor disorders.Clinical linguistics & phonetics · 2026Article
- The Speech Network in Childhood Stuttering: Differences in Functional Connectivity of the Planning and Motor Loops.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- A stuttering-associatedbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Iron dysregulation in mice engineered with a mutation associated with stuttering.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- An active inference account of stuttering behavior.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Article
- Stuttering: Our Current Knowledge, Research Opportunities, and Ways to Address Critical Gaps.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Review
- Atypical gut microbiota composition in a mouse model of developmental stuttering.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood-onset fluency disorder, commonly referred to as stuttering, affects over 70 million adults worldwide. While stuttering predominantly initiates during childhood and is more prevalent in males, it presents consistent symptoms during conversational speech. Despite these common clinical manifestations, evidence suggests that stuttering, may arise from different etiologies, emphasizing the need for personalized therapy approaches. Current research models often regard the stuttering population as a singular, homogenous group, potentially overlooking the inherent heterogeneity. This perspective consolidates both historical and recent observations to emphasize that stuttering is a heterogeneous condition with diverse causes. As such, it is crucial that both therapeutic research and clinical practices consider the potential for varied etiologies leading to stuttering. Recognizing stuttering as a spectrum disorder embraces its inherent variability, allowing for a more nuanced categorization of individuals based on the underlying causes. This perspective aligns with the principles of precision medicine, advocating for tailored treatments for distinct subgroups of people who stutter, ultimately leading to personalized therapeutic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.