ArticleEuropean urology open science2023
Feasibility and Impact of Immunohistochemistry-based Molecular Subtyping for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer in Patients Treated with Radiation-based Therapy.
Article in European urology open science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of molecular subtypes based on GATA3, KRT5, and P16 expression with clinicopathological features and prognosis in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in molecular subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer: immunohistochemical characterization and correlation with clinicopathological features.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- The Role of Immunohistochemistry as a Surrogate Marker in Molecular Subtyping and Classification of Bladder Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Distinct molecular subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) have been identified via gene expression profiling. Objective: We investigated the feasibility of a simple immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based Lund subtyping method and the association of MIBC subtypes with oncological outcomes for patients after bladder-preserving radiation-based therapy. Design setting and participants: Transurethral resected tumor tissues from 104 patients treated with radiation-based therapy were sampled on tissue microarray blocks. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The expression of KRT5, GATA3, and p16 proteins was scored via digital image analysis. Hierarchical clustering was used to classify tumors as the basal subtype or one of two luminal subtypes: genomically unstable (GU) or urothelial-like (URO). Subtypes were evaluated for association with complete response (CR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Results and limitations: The median OS was 43 mo (95% confidence interval 19-77) and median follow-up was 55 mo (interquartile range 39-75). Age and clinical stage had a significant impact on OS ( Conclusions: IHC-based molecular MIBC subtyping using a three-antibody algorithm is feasible in most patients treated with radiation-based therapy. MIBC subtype was not associated with response or survival. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm the lack of association between molecular subtype and survival in patients treated with trimodal therapy. Patient summary: For patients with invasive bladder cancer treated with radiation-based therapy, we classified tumors into different subtypes using just three molecular stains. This method is cheaper and more widely available than the usual approach. However, we did not find an association between different cancer subtypes and survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.