ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2023
Evaluation of the knee joint with ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ultrasonographic Knee Abnormalities and Their Association with Pain in Young Male Handball and Basketball Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Large language models for structuring knee ultrasound reports-A comparative evaluation of DeepSeek R1, gemini 2.5 flash, and GPT-4o.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasonography for Knee Pathologies: A Prospective Comparative Study With MRI.Cureus · 2026Article
- Snapping low-lying articularis genu muscle belly: a rare and unexpected cause of superolateral knee pain and knee snapping.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- The M-shaped posterior cruciate ligament was associated with anterolateral ligament injury after anterior cruciate ligament injuries: a 1:2 age- and sex-matched cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Advances in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Assistive Diagnosis in Pain Clinics.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Beyond the Surface: Nutritional Interventions Integrated with Diagnostic Imaging Tools to Target and Preserve Cartilage Integrity: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Automated Segmentation of Knee Menisci Using U-Net Deep Learning Model: Preliminary Results.Maedica · 2024Article
- The Utility of a Community-Based Knee Ultrasound in Detecting Meniscal Tears: A Retrospective Analysis in Comparison with MRI.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The knee joint relies on a combination of deep and superficial structures for stability and function. Both ultrasound and high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging are extremely useful in evaluating these structures and associated pathology. This article reviews a combination of critical anatomic structures, joint abnormalities, and pathologic conditions at the knee joint, while highlighting the merits, limitations, and pitfalls of the two imaging modalities. A clear appreciation of each method paired with its relative strengths will aid in expediting diagnosis and appropriate treatment for a wide range of knee joint conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.