ArticleJournal of ultrasonography2023
Added value of high-resolution ultrasound and MRI in the evaluation of rheumatologic diseases.
Article in Journal of ultrasonography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Hidden Burden of Entheseal Pathology in Lower-Limb Pain: A Real-World Ultrasound Study of 667 Adults.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2026Article
- Computational approaches to multimodal data integration in rheumatoid arthritis: from data landscape to clinical translation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Secretan's Syndrome of the Hand: Literature Review and Surgical Case Report of a Rarely Documented Condition.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Advances in Musculoskeletal Ultrasound for Assistive Diagnosis in Pain Clinics.Pain and therapy · 2025Review
- Imaging methods in monitoring gout - a pictorial essay.Journal of ultrasonography · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rheumatologic diseases are a widespread group of disorders affecting the joints, bones, and connective tissue, and leading to significant disability. Imaging is an indispensable component in diagnosing, assessing, monitoring, and managing these disorders, providing information about the structural and functional alterations occurring within the affected joints and tissues. This review article aims to compare the utility, specific clinical applications, advantages, and limitations of high-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the context of rheumatologic diseases. It also provides insights into the imaging features of various types of inflammatory arthritis with clinical relevance and a focus on high-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. By understanding the comparative aspects of high-resolution ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, it is easier for the treating physicians to make informed decisions when selecting the optimal imaging modality for specific diagnostic purposes, effective treatment planning, and improve patient outcomes. The patterns of soft tissue and joint involvement; bony erosion and synovitis help in differentiating between various type of arthritis. Involvement of various small joints of the hands also gives an insight into the type of arthritis. We also briefly discuss the potential applications of emerging techniques, such as ultrasound elastography, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, and dual-energy CT, in the field of rheumatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.