Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020497›Full record

ArticlePolish journal of radiology2023

An improvement of the CNN-XGboost model for pneumonia disease classification.

Yousra Hedhoud, Tahar Mekhaznia, Mohamed Amroune

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polish journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yousra HedhoudTebessi University, Tebessa, Algeria.
Tahar MekhazniaTebessi University, Tebessa, Algeria.
Mohamed AmrouneLAMIS Laboratory, Cheikh Larbi Tebessi University, Tebessa, Algeria.
Université Larbi Tébessi · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: X-ray images are viewed as a vital component in emergency diagnosis. They are often used by deep learning applications for disease prediction, especially for thoracic pathologies. Pneumonia, a fatal thoracic disease induced by bacteria or viruses, generates a pleural effusion where fluids are accumulated inside lungs, leading to breathing difficulty. The utilization of X-ray imaging for pneumonia detection offers several advantages over other modalities such as computed tomography scans or magnetic resonance imaging. X-rays provide a cost-effective and easily accessible method for screening and diagnosing pneumonia, allowing for quicker assessment and timely intervention. However, interpretation of chest X-ray images depends on the radiologist's competency. Within this study, we aim to suggest new elements leading to good interpretation of chest X-ray images for pneumonia detection, especially for distinguishing between viral and bacterial pneumonia. Material and methods: We proposed an interpretation model based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and extreme gradient boosting (XGboost) for pneumonia classification. The experimental study is processed through various scenarios, using Python as a programming language and a public database obtained from Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Centre. Results: The results demonstrate an acceptable accuracy of 87% within a mere 7 seconds, thereby endorsing its effectiveness compared to similar existing works. Conclusions: Our study provides a model based on CNN and XGboost to classify images of viral and bacterial pneumonia. The work is a challenging task due to the lack of appropriate data. The experimental process allows a better accuracy of 87%, a specificity of 89%, and a sensitivity of 85%.

Indexed as

bacterial pneumoniachest X-rayclassificationconvolutional neural networkextreme gradient boostingviral pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID38020497
PMCPMC10660141
OpenAlexW4388787955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.