Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020489›Full record

ArticleAcute medicine & surgery

Challenges hindering emergency physicians; involvement in multicenter collaborative studies in Japan: A nationwide survey analysis.

Manaho Yasuda, Ayaka Saito, Tadahiro Goto, Ryohei Yamamoto, Keibun Liu, Akira Kuriyama, Yutaka Kondo, Daisuke Kasugai, RED‐PAM study investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Manaho YasudaFaculty of Medicine Osaka Metropolitan University Osaka Japan.
Ayaka SaitoTXP Medical Co. Ltd. Tokyo Japan.
Tadahiro GotoTXP Medical Co. Ltd. Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-2968
Ryohei YamamotoCenter for Innovative Research for Communities and Clinical Excellence (CIRC2LE) Fukushima Medical University Fukushima Japan.
Keibun LiuCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital Chermside Queensland Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6867-1420
Akira KuriyamaDepartment of Primary Care and Emergency Medicine Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Yutaka KondoDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital Urayasu Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1072-7089
Daisuke KasugaiDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine Nagoya Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8692-3003
RED‐PAM study investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Multicenter collaborative research accelerates patient recruitment and strengthens evidence. Nevertheless, the factors influencing emergency and critical care physicians' involvement in such research in Japan remain unclear. Methods: A nationwide web-based survey conducted in early 2023 targeted emergency physicians working a minimum of 3 days per week in Japan. The survey descriptively assessed their backgrounds, work and research environments, experiences, and perceived impediments and motivators for multicenter research. Results: Of the 387 respondents, 348 were included in the study, yielding a 5.1% response rate. Women comprised 11% of the participants; 33% worked in university hospitals, 65% served in both emergency departments and intensive care units, and 54% did shift work. Only 12% had designated research time during working hours, with a median of 1 hour per week (interquartile range 0-5 h), including time outside of work. While 73% had participated in multicenter research, 58% noted barriers to participation. The key obstacles were excessive data entry (72%), meeting time constraints (59%), ethical review at each facility (50%), and unique sample collection, such as bronchoalveolar lavage specimens or pathological tissues (51%). The major incentives were networking (70%), data sets reuse (65%), feedback on research results (63%), and recognition from academic societies (63%). Financial rewards were not highly prioritized (38%). Conclusions: While valuing clinical research, emergency physicians face barriers, especially data entry burden and limited research time. Networking and sharing research findings motivate them. These insights can guide strategies to enhance collaborative research in emergency and critical care in Japan.

Indexed as

collaborative researchcross‐sectional surveyemergency medicineintensive care unitsresearch barriers

Identifiers

PMID38020489
PMCPMC10665775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.