Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020482›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of kidney health and disease2023

Identification and Prioritization of Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Topics With Multidisciplinary Stakeholders and People Living With Kidney Disease: A Clinical Research Protocol.

Brigitte H Baragar, Melissa Schorr, Nancy Verdin, Tania Woodlock, David A Clark, Gregory L Hundemer, Anna Mathew, Reem A Mustafa, Krista S Ryz, Tyrone G Harrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of kidney health and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Brigitte H BaragarDepartment of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0244-6631
Melissa SchorrDepartment of Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1076-770X
Nancy VerdinPatient and Community Engagement Research Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.
Tania WoodlockDepartment of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
David A ClarkDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1105-3418
Gregory L HundemerOttawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3559-3531
Anna MathewDivision of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Reem A MustafaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Krista S RyzDepartment of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Tyrone G HarrisonDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1068-8673

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite efforts to provide evidence-based care for people living with kidney disease, health care provider goals and priorities are often misaligned with those of individuals with lived experience of disease. Coupled with competing interests of time, resources, and an abundance of suitable guideline topics, identifying and prioritizing areas of focus for the Canadian nephrology community with a patient-oriented perspective is necessary and important. Similar priority-setting exercises have been undertaken to establish research priorities for kidney disease and to standardize outcomes for kidney disease research and clinical care; however, research priorities are distinct from priorities for guideline development. Inclusion of people living with health conditions in the selection and prioritization of guideline topics is suggested by patient engagement frameworks, though the process to operationalizing this is variable. We propose that the Canadian Society of Nephrology Clinical Practice Guideline Committee (CSN CPGC) takes the opportunity at this juncture to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with involvement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to inform future guideline activities. In this protocol, we describe our planned research methods to address this. Objective: To establish consensus-based guideline topic priorities for the CSN CPGC using a modified Delphi survey with involvement of multidisciplinary stakeholders, including people living with kidney disease and their caregivers. Study design: Protocol for a Modified Delphi Survey. Setting: Pilot-tested surveys will be distributed via email and conducted using the online platform SurveyMonkey, in both French and English. Participants: We will establish a group of multidisciplinary clinical and research stakeholders (both within and outside CSN membership) from Canada, in addition to people living with kidney disease and/or their caregivers. Methods: A comprehensive literature search will be conducted to generate an initial list of guideline topics, which will be organized into three main categories: (1) International nephrology-focused guidelines that may require Canadian commentary, (2) Non-nephrology specific guidelines from Canada that may require CSN commentary, and (3) Novel topics for guideline development. Participants will engage in a multi-round Modified Delphi Survey to prioritize a set of "important guideline topics." Measures: Consensus will be reached for an item based on both median score on the Likert-type scale (≥ 7) and the percentage agreement (≥ 75%); the Delphi process will be complete when consensus is reached on each item. Guideline topics will then be given a priority score calculated from the total Likert ratings across participants, adjusted for the number of participants. Limitations: Potential limitations include participant response rates and compliance to survey completion. Conclusions: We propose to incorporate evidence-based prioritization exercises with the engagement of people living with kidney disease and their caregivers to establish consensus-based guideline topics and inform future guidelines activities of the CSN CPGC.

Indexed as

clinical practice guidelinekidney diseasepatient engagementpriority settingtopic prioritization

Identifiers

PMID38020482
PMCPMC10676059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.