Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020431›Full record

ArticleData in brief2023

Large-scale annotation dataset for fetal head biometry in ultrasound images.

Mahmood Alzubaidi, Marco Agus, Michel Makhlouf, Fatima Anver, Khalid Alyafei, Mowafa Househ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Emerging applications of artificial intelligence for obstetric ultrasound: A scoping review.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. FetSAM: Advanced Segmentation Techniques for Fetal Head Biometrics in Ultrasound Imagery.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mahmood AlzubaidiCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar.
Marco AgusCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar.
Michel MakhloufSidra Medicine, Doha 34110, Qatar.
Fatima AnverCollege of Health Sciences, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha, 24449, Qatar.
Khalid AlyafeiSidra Medicine, Doha 34110, Qatar.
Mowafa HousehCollege of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Doha 34110, Qatar.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This dataset features a collection of 3832 high-resolution ultrasound images, each with dimensions of 959×661 pixels, focused on Fetal heads. The images highlight specific anatomical regions: the brain, cavum septum pellucidum (CSP), and lateral ventricles (LV). The dataset was assembled under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, using previously anonymized and de-identified images to maintain ethical standards. Each image is complemented by a CSV file detailing pixel size in millimeters (mm). For enhanced compatibility and usability, the dataset is available in 11 universally accepted formats, including Cityscapes, YOLO, CVAT, Datumaro, COCO, TFRecord, PASCAL, LabelMe, Segmentation mask, OpenImage, and ICDAR. This broad range of formats ensures adaptability for various computer vision tasks, such as classification, segmentation, and object detection. It is also compatible with multiple medical imaging software and deep learning frameworks. The reliability of the annotations is verified through a two-step validation process involving a Senior Attending Physician and a Radiologic Technologist. The Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) and Jaccard similarity indices (JS) are utilized to quantify inter-rater agreement. The dataset exhibits high annotation reliability, with ICC values averaging at 0.859 and 0.889, and JS values at 0.855 and 0.857 in two iterative rounds of annotation. This dataset is designed to be an invaluable resource for ongoing and future research projects in medical imaging and computer vision. It is particularly suited for applications in prenatal diagnostics, clinical diagnosis, and computer-assisted interventions. Its detailed annotations, broad compatibility, and ethical compliance make it a highly reusable and adaptable tool for the development of algorithms aimed at improving maternal and Fetal health.

Indexed as

Computer visionData annotationFetal ultrasound imagingMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID38020431
PMCPMC10630602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.