ArticleChemical science2023
Data-driven discovery of innate immunomodulators
Article in Chemical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Uncoupling Type I Interferon Benefits From Inflammatory Toxicity: Transformer-Prioritized Precision Agonists for Potent and Safer Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- VDLIN: A Deep Learning-Based Platform for Methylcobalamin-Inspired Immunomodulatory Compound Screening.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Interferon regulatory factors: the next prospective targets for tissue ischemia-reperfusion injury?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Bioengineering approaches to trained immunity: Physiologic targets and therapeutic strategies.eLife · 2025Review
- The Promise and Predicament of Combining Adjuvants in Vaccines.Vaccine insights · 2025Article
- Machine learning in biological physics: From biomolecular prediction to design.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The innate immune response is vital for the success of prophylactic vaccines and immunotherapies. Control of signaling in innate immune pathways can improve prophylactic vaccines by inhibiting unfavorable systemic inflammation and immunotherapies by enhancing immune stimulation. In this work, we developed a machine learning-enabled active learning pipeline to guide
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.