Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38020329›Full record

ReviewCJC open2023

Systematic Review of the Use of the 6-Minute Walk Test in Measuring and Improving Prognosis in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease.

Andrew Coulshed, David Coulshed, Faraz Pathan

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in CJC open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Clarifying Exercise Intolerance inNursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew CoulshedRoyal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David CoulshedDepartment of Cardiology, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
Faraz PathanDepartment of Cardiology, Nepean Hospital, University of Sydney, Penrith, New South Wales, Australia.
The University of Sydney · AURoyal Prince Alfred Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) has been used for over 30 years to assess exercise capacity in patients with respiratory disease, and more recently, in those with heart failure. However, despite being a simple and reproducible test of real-world exercise capacity, its use in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) is less well accepted. We sought to review systematically the evidence surrounding the 6MWT in IHD. Methods: We searched the Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for the following key terms: "six minute walk test/6 minute walk test/6MWT" and "angina/coronary artery disease/coronary disease/IHD/ischemic heart disease." We followed Results: A total of 1228 unique papers were found, of which 71 were chosen for full-text review and 37 for detailed analysis. Most (23) concerned the effect on 6MWT distance (6MWTd) of cardiac rehabilitation, with measurements commenced after an intervention (acute myocardial infarction, n = 4; open heart surgery (OHS), n = 5; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), n = 3; or other, n = 11). The effect on 6MWTd of OHS was investigated in 6 studies and of PCI in one study. The 6MWT is a useful measurement of physical capacity; data are limited on its ability to assess benefit following PCI. Conclusions: The 6MWT has been studied inconsistently in IHD. The majority of data are on patients before and after CR. Data are limited concerning the effect on 6MWTd of OHS or PCI. The available data support the 6MWT as a measure of change in performance status following coronary intervention. More work is required to confirm this hypothesis.

Identifiers

PMID38020329
PMCPMC10679465
OpenAlexW4385790463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.